The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific T Helper Cell Requirement for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes against Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Negative Tumors
Open accessAbstract
This study shows that induction of tumor-specific CD4+ T cells by vaccination with a specific viral T helper epitope, contained within a synthetic peptide, results in protective immunity against major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II negative, virus-induced tumor cells. Protection was also induced against sarcoma induction by acutely transforming retrovirus. In contrast, no protective immunity was induced by vaccination with an unrelated T helper epitope. By cytokine pattern analysis, the induced CD4+ T cells were of the T helper cell 1 type. The peptide-specific CD4+ T cells did not directly recognize the tumor cells, indicating involvement of cross-priming by tumor-associated antigen-presenting cells. The main effector cells responsible for tumor eradication were identified as CD8+ cytotoxic T cells that were found to recognize a recently described immunodominant viral gag-encoded cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope, which is unrelated to the viral env-encoded T helper peptide sequence. Simultaneous vaccination with the tumor-specific T helper and CTL epitopes resulted in strong synergistic protection. These results indicate the crucial role of T helper cells for optimal induction of protective immunity against MHC class II negative tumor cells. Protection is dependent on tumor-specific CTLs in this model system and requires cross-priming of tumor antigens by specialized antigen-presenting cells. Thus, tumor-specific T helper epitopes have to be included in the design of epitope-based vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CD4+ T cell help in cancer immunology and immunotherapy
Borst, J., Ahrends, T., Bąbała, N., Melief, C. J. M., & Kastenmüller, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-018-0044-0 · Cited by 1,585
Self-citationSaxena, M., van der Burg, S. H., Melief, C. J. M., & Bhardwaj, N. (2021) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00346-0 · Cited by 1,581
Self-citationAdvances in the development of personalized neoantigen-based therapeutic cancer vaccines
Blass, E., & Ott, P. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00460-2 · Cited by 1,042
MHC-II neoantigens shape tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy
Alspach, E., Lussier, D. M., Miceli, A. P., Kizhvatov, I., DuPage, M., Luoma, A. M., Meng, W., Lichti, C. F., Esaulova, E., Vomund, A. N., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1671-8 · Cited by 846
Immunotherapy of established (pre)malignant disease by synthetic long peptide vaccines
Melief, C. J. M., & van der Burg, S. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2373 · Cited by 594
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ossendorp, F., Mengedé, E., Camps, M., Filius, R., & Melief, C. J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1998-03-02
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 693-702
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2063366670
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific T Helper Cell Requirement for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes against Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Negative Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.187.5.693
- The paper
- Ossendorp, F., Mengedé, E., Camps, M., Filius, R., & Melief, C. J. M. (1998). Specific T Helper Cell Requirement for Optimal Induction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes against Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Negative Tumors. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.187.5.693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.