The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TCR ligand density and affinity determine peripheral induction of Foxp3 in vivo
Open accessAbstract
T cell receptor (TCR) ligation is required for the extrathymic differentiation of forkhead box p3+ (Foxp3+) regulatory T cells. Several lines of evidence indicate that weak TCR stimulation favors induction of Foxp3 in the periphery; however, it remains to be determined how TCR ligand potency influences this process. We characterized the density and affinity of TCR ligand favorable for Foxp3 induction and found that a low dose of a strong agonist resulted in maximal induction of Foxp3 in vivo. Initial Foxp3 induction by weak agonist peptide could be enhanced by disruption of TCR–peptide major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) interactions or alteration of peptide dose. However, time course experiments revealed that Foxp3-positive cells induced by weak agonist stimulation are deleted, along with their Foxp3-negative counterparts, whereas Foxp3-positive cells induced by low doses of the strong agonist persist. Our results suggest that, together, pMHC ligand potency, density, and duration of TCR interactions define a cumulative quantity of TCR stimulation that determines initial peripheral Foxp3 induction. However, in the persistence of induced Foxp3+ T cells, TCR ligand potency and density are noninterchangeable factors that influence the route to peripheral tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of Regulatory T Cell Development by the Transcription Factor Foxp3
Hori, S., Nomura, T., & Sakaguchi, S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079490 · Cited by 8,187
Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells
Fontenot, J. D., Gavin, M. A., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni904 · Cited by 7,745
TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways
Štefanová, I., Hemmer, B., Vergelli, M., Martin, R., Biddison, W. E., & Germain, R. N. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni895 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function
Josefowicz, S. Z., Lu, L.-F., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2012) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141623 · Cited by 2,866
Chakarov, S., Lim, H. Y., Tan, L., Lim, S. Y., See, P., Lum, J., Zhang, X.-M., Foo, S., Nakamizo, S., Duan, K., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0964 · Cited by 1,114
Past, Present, and Future of Regulatory T Cell Therapy in Transplantation and Autoimmunity
Romano, M., Fanelli, G., Albany, C. J., Giganti, G., & Lombardi, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00043 · Cited by 512
T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function
Li, M. O., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.26 · Cited by 493
Recent insights of T cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for T cell activation and development
Hwang, J.-R., Byeon, Y., Kim, D., & Park, S.-G. (2020) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0435-8 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottschalk, R. A., Corse, E., & Allison, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2010-07-26
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1701-1711
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2014489332
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.