Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

F−/Cl− selectivity in CLCF-type F−/H+ antiporters

Brammer, Ashley E., Stockbridge, Randy B., Miller, Christopher·2014·Journal of General Physiology

Abstract

Many bacterial species protect themselves against environmental F− toxicity by exporting this anion from the cytoplasm via CLCF F−/H+ antiporters, a subclass of CLC superfamily anion transporters. Strong F− over Cl− selectivity is biologically essential for these membrane proteins because Cl− is orders of magnitude more abundant in the biosphere than F−. Sequence comparisons reveal differences between CLCFs and canonical Cl−-transporting CLCs within regions that, in the canonical CLCs, coordinate Cl− ion and govern anion transport. A phylogenetic split within the CLCF clade, manifested in sequence divergence in the vicinity of this ion-binding center, raises the possibility that these two CLCF subclades might exhibit differences in anion selectivity. Several CLCF homologues from each subclade were examined for F−/Cl− selectivity of anion transport and equilibrium binding. Differences in both of these anion-selectivity metrics correlate with sequence divergence among CLCFs. Chimeric constructs identify two residues in this region that largely account for the subclade differences in selectivity. In addition, these experiments serendipitously uncovered an unusually steep, Cl−-specific voltage dependence of transport that greatly enhances F− selectivity at low voltage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1085/jgp.201411225

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Accardi, 2010, CLC channels and transporters: proteins with borderline personalities, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1798, 1457, 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.02.022 · DOI
  2. Accardi, 2006, Synergism between halide binding and proton transport in a CLC-type exchanger, J. Mol. Biol., 362, 691, 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.081 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baker, 2012, Widespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride, Science., 335, 233, 10.1126/science.1215063 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cametti, 2009, Recognition and sensing of fluoride anion, Chem. Commun. (Camb.)., 2809, 10.1039/b902069a · DOI · Paper page
  5. De Stefano, 2013, A single point mutation reveals gating of the human ClC-5 Cl−/H+ antiporter, J. Physiol., 591, 5879, 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.260240 · DOI
  6. Dutzler, 2003, Gating the selectivity filter in ClC chloride channels, Science., 300, 108, 10.1126/science.1082708 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Edgar, 2004, MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792, 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Finkelstein, 1981, The gramicidin A channel: a review of its permeability characteristics with special reference to the single-file aspect of transport, J. Membr. Biol., 59, 155, 10.1007/BF01875422 · DOI
  9. Gouy, 2010, SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building, Mol. Biol. Evol., 27, 221, 10.1093/molbev/msp259 · DOI
  10. Guindon, 2010, New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0, Syst. Biol., 59, 307, 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jin, 1999, Light scattering characterization of extruded lipid vesicles, Eur. Biophys. J., 28, 187, 10.1007/s002490050199 · DOI
  12. Li, 2013, Eukaryotic resistance to fluoride toxicity mediated by a widespread family of fluoride export proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 110, 19018, 10.1073/pnas.1310439110 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lim, 2013, Fluoride-dependent interruption of the transport cycle of a CLC Cl−/H+ antiporter, Nat. Chem. Biol., 9, 721, 10.1038/nchembio.1336 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Miller, 2006, ClC chloride channels viewed through a transporter lens, Nature., 440, 484, 10.1038/nature04713 · DOI
  15. Picollo, 2009, Basis of substrate binding and conservation of selectivity in the CLC family of channels and transporters, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16, 1294, 10.1038/nsmb.1704 · DOI
  16. Schultz, 1962, Cation transport in Escherichia coli. II. Intracellular chloride concentration, J. Gen. Physiol., 46, 159, 10.1085/jgp.46.1.159 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Smith, 2010, Voltage-dependent charge movement associated with activation of the CLC-5 2Cl−/1H+ exchanger, FASEB J., 24, 3696, 10.1096/fj.09-150649 · DOI
  18. Stockbridge, 2012, Fluoride resistance and transport by riboswitch-controlled CLC antiporters, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 109, 15289, 10.1073/pnas.1210896109 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Stockbridge, 2013, A family of fluoride-specific ion channels with dual-topology architecture, eLife., 2, e01084, 10.7554/eLife.01084 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Walden, 2007, Uncoupling and turnover in a Cl−/H+ exchange transporter, J. Gen. Physiol., 129, 317, 10.1085/jgp.200709756 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Zifarelli, 2007, CLC chloride channels and transporters: a biophysical and physiological perspective, Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol., 158, 23, 10.1007/112_2006_0605 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brammer, A. E., Stockbridge, R. B., & Miller, C.
Venue
Journal of General Physiology
Published
2014-07-28
Volume
144
Issue
2
Pages
129-136
ISSN
  • 1540-7748
  • 0022-1295
Cited by
54
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review