Cited by 225Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Neutral gas in the central 2 parsecs of the Galaxy

Jackson, J. M., Geis, N., Genzel, R., Harris, A. I., Madden, S., Poglitsch, A., Stacey, G. J., Townes, C. H.·1993·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

New spectroscopic observations are presented that elucidate the spatial distribution, kinematics, and density structure of atomic and molecular gas within about 2 p from IRS 16/SgrA*. The measurements confirm the presence of a dense clumpy molecular gas ring surrounding a short-lived central cavity of much lower mean gas density. It appears that this ring consists of several distinct and probably short-lived gas streamers that result from accretion from the massive molecular clouds within 10-30 pc of the center toward the central gravitational potential. Within 1 pc of SgrA* a large atomic cloud is found that appears to be falling in from more than 3 pc Galactocentric distance into the central cavity. The northern and eastern 'arms' of ionized gas are very likely dense bright rims at the surface of this atomic cloud that is now exposed to the intense UV radiation from the few central arcsec surrounding IRS 16/SgrA*.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/172120

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CND (inclination ≈70°) and ionized streams (inclination ≈50°) are significantly misaligned with the large scale Galactic plane (inclination=90°).

    “The CND(inclination ≈ 70 ◦ ) and ionized streams (inclination ≈ 50 ◦ ) are significantly misaligned with the large scale Galactic plane (inclination = 90 ◦ ) (Jackson et al. 1993; Paumard et al. 2004; Zhao et al. 2009; Genzel et al. 2010), an important issue I will come back to below.”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Jackson et al. 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, J. M., Geis, N., Genzel, R., Harris, A. I., Madden, S., Poglitsch, A., Stacey, G. J., & Townes, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1993-01
Volume
402
Pages
173
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1978580274
Cited by
225
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • STIN
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Galactic Center, Sgr A*, IRS 16, molecular gas, atomic gas, gas kinematics, central cavity, gas accretion, ionized gas, ultraviolet radiation, molecular clouds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review