The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes
Abstract
Subjects learned product Information presented in various formats, either expecting a subsequent recall task or incidental to making a choice. They then retrieved information from memory or made a choice based on it. Analysis of concurrent verbal protocols showed significantly different processing patterns in both memory-retrieval and choice stemming from the experimental manipulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208812 · Cited by 1,344
Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
Tulving, E. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043150 · Cited by 867
Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033773 · Cited by 820
Cited by
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
Vessey, I. (1991) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,263
Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion?
Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(99)80105-5 · Cited by 894
AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL OF TOURISTS’ INFORMATION SEARCH BEHAVIOR
Gursoy, D., & McCleary, K. W. (2004) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.004 · Cited by 680
Decision difficulty in the age of consumer empowerment
Broniarczyk, S. M., & Griffin, J. G. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.003 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W1977882890
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/208883
- The paper
- Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1982). Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/208883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
