The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought
Abstract
Two experiments investigate the formation of attitudes toward unattended stimuli. In Experiment 1, a presentation format that encourages processing at a preconscious level demonstrates that attitude formation can occur independently of conscious consideration. Alternative theoretical explanations are offered to account for the purported independence of conscious thought and preference formation, and Experiment 2 is a test of these alternatives. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that consumers use differential hemispheric strategies for task performance to form preconsciously based attitudes. A post hoc analysis is conducted to advance more explicit claims about the operational nature of the underlying preconscious processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983
Cited by
How advertising works: what do we really know?
Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300103 · Cited by 1,436
Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product
Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208544 · Cited by 958
Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework
MacInnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300401 · Cited by 653
Campbell, M. C. (1995) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0403_02 · Cited by 554
Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects
Janiszewski, C. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209356 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Janiszewski, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2107829689
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209157
- The paper
- Janiszewski, C. (1988). Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.