The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Generation and Consequences of Communication-Evoked Imagery
Abstract
Consumer researchers seem to believe that the use of imagery increases recall, enhances attitude toward the brand, and positively affects behavioral intentions. Yet few empirical investigations of imagery effects have been conducted in a consumer-behavior context. In this article, we provide a theoretical rationale based on extant literature as to which imagery content variables may influence imagery and how imagery may, in turn, affect key purchase-related variables such as attitudes and behavioral intentions. In addition, the results of two empirical investigations are presented. These studies address how self versus other relatedness and situation plausibility affect the degree of reported imagery and subsequently affect ad and brand evaluations. The results of the two studies show that the focal character and plausibility of the imagined scene influence the degree of imagery evoked by the message. Focal character is shown to directly affect attitude toward the ad. In addition, we find that imagery directly influences attitude toward the ad but has no effect on attitude toward the brand or behavioral intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES
MARKS, D. F. (1973) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,778
Cited by
Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer
Fiore, A. M., Kim, J., & Lee, H.-H. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20042 · Cited by 495
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/661531 · Cited by 465
The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word‐of‐mouth behaviour
Wirtz, J., & Chew, P. (2002) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230210425340 · Cited by 393
Making Green Stuff? Effects of Corporate Greenwashing on Consumers
De Jong, M. D. T., Harkink, K. M., & Barth, S. (2018) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651917729863 · Cited by 249
Believe it or not: Credibility of blogs in tourism
Mack, R. W., Blose, J. E., & Pan, B. (2008) · Journal of Vacation Marketing · doi:10.1177/1356766707087521 · Cited by 222
Sun, C., Fang, Y., Kong, M., Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102828 · Cited by 148
The roles of sensory perceptions and mental imagery in consumer decision-making
Kim, M., Kim, J.-H., Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102517 · Cited by 97
Cheng, Z., Shao, B., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812579 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Bone, P. F., & Ellen, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2060096009
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.