The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?
Abstract
This article examines consumers' perceptions of warranties within the framework of economic signaling theory. We develop propositions about conditions under which higher warranties may lead to higher, lower, or the same quality perceptions as do lower warranties. These quality perceptions of consumers are consistent with different types of market equilibria predicted by signaling theory. The propositions are tested in an experiment which varies warranty length, warranty scope, and the conditions for warranty signaling. Results suggest that, in general, consumer responses to warranties are consistent with the behavioral assumptions of signaling theory. The authors suggest that consumer researchers can gain greater insight by integrating signaling theory with psychologically based approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information
Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209228 · Cited by 481
The Effects of Advertiser Reputation and Extremity of Advertising Claim on Advertising Effectiveness
Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208547 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments
Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281014 · Cited by 1,635
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21001 · Cited by 809
On Product Uncertainty in Online Markets: Theory and Evidence1
Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703461 · Cited by 682
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.834803 · Cited by 620
Strategies for reducing consumers’ risk aversion in Internet shopping
Jiuan Tan, S. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910260515 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2011659350
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209337
- The paper
- Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality? Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.