The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption
Abstract
In this article, we elaborate on various key ideas about consumption and consumer from a theoretical position that we have labeled “liberatory postmodernism.” By unmasking the limitations of modernism that have to do with the onerous nature of its metanarratives and narrow conventionalism, we show that postmodern developments offer alternate visions of consumption processes that have an emancipatory potential. The analysis in our article begins with a discussion of the philosophical foundations of modernism and postmodernism followed by a cultural critique of modernism—exposing, for example, the modernist distinction between production and consumption and the privileging of production over consumption. We demonstrate how postmodernism is concerned with the reversing of the conditions of modernity and with a wide range of issues regarding the construction of the subject (i.e., the consumer), the role of the symbolic in consumption processes, the notion of the spectacularization of life, the creation of the hyperreal, and the cultural signification of fragmentation. We conclude the article with a proposal for an epistemology of consumption that subsumes scientific knowledge under a broader category of narrative knowledge and recognizes multivocality of consumption forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art
Clifford, J. (1988) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9x0h · Cited by 5,528
Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities
Mccracken, G. (1990) · doi:10.2979/1450.0 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/666376 · Cited by 2,015
Extended Self in a Digital World: Table 1.
Belk, R. W. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/671052 · Cited by 1,698
Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek's Culture of Consumption : Figure 1
Kozinets, R. V. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/321948 · Cited by 1,051
Metadata
- Authors
- Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2131928395
- Cited by
- 1,629
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 127.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209448
- The paper
- Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory Postmodernism and the Reenchantment of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.