The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey Studies
Abstract
This paper is concerned with social desirability as a source of bias and invalidity in survey studies. Two components of social desirability-"trait desirability" and "need for siscal approval"-are examined to assess the extent to which they effect people's responses to several sociological measures (e.g., happiness, religiosity). This analysis reveals that both components of a social-desirability response set, while generally unrelated to one another, are independently related to our dependent variables, people's responses on the various measures. The more important of the two components, trait desirability, is then examined with regard to its effect on the relationship between people's sexual status and the dependent variables. This introduction to the analysis of trait desirability as a test factor tends to specify both the magnitude and the direction of the original relationships involving sexual status. Finally, the results are discussed with regard to their implications for the validity of various sociological measures and the validity of the sociological investigator's findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Cited by
Hofstede, G. (1980) · International Studies of Management & Organization · doi:10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300 · Cited by 3,178
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 · Cited by 3,057
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
Nederhof, A. J. (1985) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150303 · Cited by 2,340
Mixed method data collection strategies
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-6909 · Cited by 278
A refinement and validation of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire (MCPQ)
Ley, J. M., Bennett, P. C., & Coleman, G. J. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.09.009 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, D. L., & Clancy, K. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 921-940
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1980352827
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/225231
- The paper
- Phillips, D. L., & Clancy, K. J. (1972). Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey Studies. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/225231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.