The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Divergence of Black and White Marriage Patterns
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the patterns and determinants of first marriage among black and white women in the United States. Three major differences exist between the first-marriage patterns of black and white women: (1) lower proportions of blacks marry than whites; (2) the proportion of women who ever marry has declined substantially across cohorts for blacks but modestly across cohorts for whites; and (3) while increased education is associated negatively, if slightly, with the probability of ever marrying among whites, it is associated positively among blacks. The observed racial divergence is consistent with three factors experienced differentially by blacks and whits: the marriage squeeze, labor-market success, and out-of-wedlock childbearing. Given the traditional age differences between spouses, there are far fewer eligible male mates for black women than for white women among cohorts born before the late 1950s. For both blacks and whites, employment status is positively associated with the propensity to marry, but for young blacks the labor-market situation is generally poor and has deteriorated significantly across time in comparison with other groups. Finally, having an out-of-wedlock child at an early age is strongly negatively associated with the likelihood that a woman will ultimately marry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Women's Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137521 · Cited by 769
Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women
Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088920 · Cited by 580
Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality
Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M., & Lim, N. (1997) · Demography · doi:10.2307/3038286 · Cited by 440
The Times They Are a Changin': Marital Status and Health Differentials from 1972 to 2003
Liu, H., & Umberson, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650804900301 · Cited by 423
Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women
Lichter, D. T., LeClere, F. B., & McLaughlin, D. K. (1991) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229610 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, N. G., Bloom, D. E., & Craig, P. H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 692-722
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2013194854
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Divergence of Black and White Marriage Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/229330
- The paper
- Bennett, N. G., Bloom, D. E., & Craig, P. H. (1989). The Divergence of Black and White Marriage Patterns. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/229330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.