The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track
Open accessAbstract
Studies of horse race betting have empirically established a long shot anomaly; that is, low‐probabiliy, high‐variance bets (long shots) provide low mean returns and high‐probability, lowvariance bets provide relatively high mean returns. Because bettors willingly accept low‐return, high‐variance bets, researchers conclude that bettors are risk lovers. In this study, we show that the data are at least as consistent with risk aversion as they are with risk loving when one explicitly considers the skewness of bet returns. Because the variance and skewness of bet returns are highly correlated, bettors may appear to prefer variance when it is skewness that they crave.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Equity Portfolio Diversification
Goetzmann, W. N., & Kumar, A. (2008) · Review of Finance · doi:10.1093/rof/rfn005 · Cited by 1,222
Why are Gambling Markets Organised so Differently from Financial Markets?
Levitt, S. D. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00207.x · Cited by 377
Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love or Misperceptions?
Snowberg, E., & Wolfers, J. (2010) · doi:10.3386/w15923 · Cited by 44
Do Realized Skewness and Kurtosis Predict the Cross-Section of Equity Returns?
Amaya, D., Christoffersen, P., Jacobs, K., & Vasquez, A. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2024782 · Cited by 28
Are Sports Bettors Biased toward Longshots, Favorites, or Both? A Literature Review
Newall, P. W. S., & Cortis, D. (2021) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks9010022 · Cited by 14
Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S. W., & Camerer, C. (2025) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdae093 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Golec, J., & Tamarkin, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-225
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2093613276
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
