Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Analysis of Diet Selection by Large Generalist Herbivores

Westoby, Mark·1974·The American Naturalist
DOI 10.1086/282908
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ecological theory has formulated the objective of feeding strategies as to maximize the capture rate of some nutrient. But large generalist herbivores typically face a limit on how much material they can digest. Thus, their feeding strategy is best considered as aiming to achieve the best nutritional balance within a fixed total bulk of food. The problem of finding the diet which provides the best mix of nutrients can be formulated as a linear program. A property of this "optimization model" is that the contribution of a food to the diet will sometimes vary with the food's content of a particular nutrient and sometimes will not. This might explain why no consistent relations of this kind have been found experimentally. The long-delay learning mechanism is described. If this exists in large generalist herbivores, it would provide a means by which they might pursue optimization of nutrient mix in the diet. It would also account for the very large inter- and intraindividual variability in preference reported. Optimization achieved by this means would be imperfect. First, the necessary sampling of foods would modify the diet in the direction of greater variety than predicted by the linear model. Second, optimization would not act perfectly on all nutrients. If diet selection is dominated by the need to meet nutritional criteria, the response of the diet to availability of particular foods should not be continuous but take the form of a cutoff at very low availability. This implies that as a food becomes rarer in a plant community, grazing pressure on it will increase, at least until the cutoff is reached.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282908

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Westoby, M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
1974-05
Volume
108
Issue
961
Pages
290-304
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
DOI
10.1086/282908
OpenAlex
W2069669017
Cited by
554
References
16
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.