The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive Patterns in Alkaloid Physiology
Abstract
Alkaloid transport and storage are reviewed, with emphasis on problems associated with presence of toxic chemicals in living plants. Many patterns in the physiology of alkaloids and other defense compounds are shaped by the twin requirements that these compounds must be inactive in the plant and yet active in the presence of herbivores. The distribution of alkaloids in the plant and changes in distribution during the plant's life are also reviewed. Within individual plants, alkaloids are generally concentrated in those parts upon which herbivore attack would have the greatest effect on the plant's fitness. The relative defense requirements of different parts, based on their contribution to fitness and their vulnerability to herbivores, shift during the plant's life. These shifts are mirrored by corresponding shifts in alkaloid concentration. Ovules, seeds, and immature fruits are often the sites of highest alkaloid concentration. Allocation of defensive chemicals between mature and immature foliage should follow different patterns in trees and in herbs. In trees, the "phenological protection" given to synchronously produced flushes of new leaves and the need for protection of mature leaves until a new flush of young leaves can be produced have selected for greater toxin accumulation in mature leaves. In herbs, young leaves lack both mechanical and phenological defense, so there is strong selection for providing them with chemical defenses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herbivory in Relation to Plant Nitrogen Content
Mattson, W. J. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003 · Cited by 3,425
Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense
Feeny, P. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1 · Cited by 2,344
Herbivory and Defensive Characteristics of Tree Species in a Lowland Tropical Forest
Coley, P. D. (1983) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942495 · Cited by 1,768
Erb, M., & Kliebenstein, D. J. (2020) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.20.00433 · Cited by 1,333
Protective Ant-Plant Interactions as Model Systems in Ecological and Evolutionary Research
Heil, M., & McKey, D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132410 · Cited by 718
Self-citationThe ecological significance of toxic nectar
Adler, L. S. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x · Cited by 592
Light Regulation of Plant Defense
Ballaré, C. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040145 · Cited by 560
Milton, K. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283485 · Cited by 537
NRT/PTR transporters are essential for translocation of glucosinolate defence compounds to seeds
Nour-Eldin, H. H., Andersen, T. G., Burow, M., Madsen, S. R., Jørgensen, M. E., Olsen, C. E., Dreyer, I., Hedrich, R., Geiger, D., & Halkier, B. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11285 · Cited by 489
Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory
McCall, A. C., & Irwin, R. E. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x · Cited by 478
Selection of Winter Forage by Subarctic Browsing Vertebrates: The Role of Plant Chemistry
Bryant, J. P., & Kuropat, P. J. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001401 · Cited by 473
Costs and Benefits of Plant Resistance to Herbivory
Simms, E. L., & Rausher, M. D. (1987) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284731 · Cited by 384
Costs and trade-offs associated with induced resistance
Walters, D., & Heil, M. (2007) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2007.09.008 · Cited by 358
Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany
Gaoue, O. G., Coe, M. A., Bond, M., Hart, G., Seyler, B. C., & McMillen, H. (2017) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8 · Cited by 322
Seed survival in soil: interacting effects of predation, dormancy and the soil microbial community
Dalling, J. W., Davis, A. S., Schutte, B. J., & Elizabeth Arnold, A. (2011) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01739.x · Cited by 297
Herbivore Population Dynamics and Plant Chemistry
RHOADES, D. F. (1983) · Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-209160-5.50012-x · Cited by 290
Kaur, H., Heinzel, N., Schöttner, M., Baldwin, I. T., & GÁlis, I. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.109.151738 · Cited by 254
Defence on demand: mechanisms behind optimal defence patterns
Meldau, S., Erb, M., & Baldwin, I. T. (2012) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs212 · Cited by 197
Integrated antiherbivore, antidesiccant and ultraviolet screening properties of creosotebush resin
Rhoades, D. F. (1977) · Biochemical Systematics and Ecology · doi:10.1016/0305-1978(77)90027-8 · Cited by 101
Cost of Defense in the Context of Plant Competition: Brassica rapa May Grow and Defend
Siemens, D. H., Garner, S. H., Mitchell-Olds, T., & Callaway, R. M. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2680031 · Cited by 37
Huang, W., Bont, Z., Hervé, M. R., Robert, C. A. M., & Erb, M. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-019-01126-9 · Cited by 27
Tullus, A., Rusalepp, L., Lutter, R., Rosenvald, K., Kaasik, A., Rytter, L., Kontunen-Soppela, S., & Oksanen, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.746165 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- McKey, D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1974-05
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 961
- Pages
- 305-320
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2030677993
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.