The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information
Open accessAbstract
The acquisition and use of socially acquired information is commonly assumed to be profitable. We challenge this assumption by exploring hypothetical scenarios where the use of such information either provides no benefit or can actually be costly. First, we show that the level of incompatibility between the acquisition of personal and socially acquired information will directly affect the extent to which the use of socially acquired information can be profitable. When these two sources of information cannot be acquired simultaneously, there may be no benefit to socially acquired information. Second, we assume that a solitary individual's behavioural decisions will be based on cues revealed by its own interactions with the environment. However, in many cases, for social animals the only socially acquired information available to individuals is the behavioural actions of others that expose their decisions, rather than the cues on which these decisions were based. We argue that in such a situation the use of socially acquired information can lead to informational cascades that sometimes result in sub–optimal behaviour. From this theory of informational cascades, we predict that when erroneous cascades are costly, individuals should pay attention only to socially generated cues and not behavioural decisions. We suggest three scenarios that might be examples of informational cascades in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Griesemer, J. R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1986) · The Condor · doi:10.2307/1367778 · Cited by 7,034
Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.3.151 · Cited by 1,915
Giraldeau, L.-A., & Caraco, T. (2000) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691188348 · Cited by 1,087
Self-citationTHE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN ASSEMBLAGES OF BIRDS AS “INFORMATION‐CENTRES” FOR FOOD‐FINDING
Ward, P., & Zahavi, A. (1973) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1973.tb01990.x · Cited by 1,086
Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts
Pitcher, T. J. (1986) · The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_12 · Cited by 962
Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions
Galef, B. G., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (2001) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1557 · Cited by 716
Self-citationThe evolutionary advantages of group foraging
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1986) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(86)90024-9 · Cited by 636
Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284228 · Cited by 444
Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon
Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1064 · Cited by 419
Self-citationFLOCKING AND FEEDING IN THE GREAT TIT PARUS MAJOR–AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
Krebs, J. R., MacRoberts, M. H., & Cullen, J. M. (1972) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1972.tb00852.x · Cited by 398
Cited by
Laland, K. N. (2004) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03196002 · Cited by 1,551
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology
DALL, S., GIRALDEAU, L., OLSSON, O., MCNAMARA, J., & STEPHENS, D. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationWhy Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament
Rendell, L., Boyd, R., Cownden, D., Enquist, M., Eriksson, K., Feldman, M. W., Fogarty, L., Ghirlanda, S., Lillicrap, T., & Laland, K. N. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1184719 · Cited by 811
Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies
Rendell, L., Fogarty, L., Hoppitt, W. J. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Webster, M. M., & Laland, K. N. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.002 · Cited by 549
Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., Lazer, D., Redish, A. D., & Couzin, I. D. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.10.004 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Giraldeau, L., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2002-11-29
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 1427
- Pages
- 1559-1566
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2008003407
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2002.1065
- The paper
- Giraldeau, L., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002). Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
