The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antipredator Behavior and the Population Dynamics of Simple Predator-Prey Systems
Abstract
We derive a model that has one predator and one prey species and includes antipredator behavior. The prey are allowed to increase their investment in antipredator behavior, thereby decreasing their chance of being captured by the predator. However, they must pay for this protection by a cost exacted through decreased fecundity or increased mortality caused by factors other than predation. The population-dynamic consequences of antipredator behaviors are explored by comparing systems in which the efficiencies of the antipredator behavior differ; as the antipredator behavior becomes more efficient, the prey need to invest less in order to achieve the same level of protection from the predator. We assume that for any degree of efficiency, the prey choose their level of investment in antipredator behavior in order to optimize their expected reproductive fitness. By assuming only that the predators and prey coexist and that there is a stable equilibrium, we show that increased efficiency of antipredator behaviors increases prey densities and decreases the ratio of predator-to-prey densities. This is true even though the prey's level of investment in antipredator behavior initially increases and then decreases with increasing efficiency of the antipredator behavior. Consequently, the effect of antipredator behaviors on population densities cannot be inferred from the level of prey investment in these behaviors. A specific model is used to illustrate the second result of the paper, that antipredator behaviors tend to decrease the oscillatory dynamics inherent in model predatorprey systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems
May, R. M. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691206912 · Cited by 5,183
Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism
Holling, C. S. (1959) · The Canadian Entomologist · doi:10.4039/ent91385-7 · Cited by 4,609
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions
Rosenzweig, M. L., & MacArthur, R. H. (1963) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282272 · Cited by 2,049
An Experimental Test of the Effects of Predation Risk on Habitat Use in Fish
Werner, E. E., Gilliam, J. F., Hall, D. J., & Mittelbach, G. G. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937508 · Cited by 1,675
The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems
Kuris, A. M., & Hassell, M. P. (1979) · The Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.2307/3280305 · Cited by 1,581
Herbivory: the Dynamics of Animal-plant Interactions
Crawley, M. J. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,211
A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns
Endler, J. A. (1978) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6956-5_5 · Cited by 1,181
Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities
JEFFRIES, M. J., & LAWTON, J. H. (1984) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00145.x · Cited by 954
Modelling Fluctuating Populations.
Mani, G. S., Nisbet, R. M., & Gurney, W. S. C. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259993 · Cited by 865
Cited by
Nonlethal Effects in the Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions
Lima, S. L. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313225 · Cited by 1,852
Relationships between direct predation and risk effects
Creel, S., & Christianson, D. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004 · Cited by 1,238
The Evolution of Predator-Prey Interactions: Theory and Evidence
Abrams, P. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.79 · Cited by 912
Prey Uncertainty and the Balancing of Antipredator and Feeding Needs
Sih, A. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285372 · Cited by 536
Peckarsky, B. L., Abrams, P. A., Bolnick, D. I., Dill, L. M., Grabowski, J. H., Luttbeg, B., Orrock, J. L., Peacor, S. D., Preisser, E. L., Schmitz, O. J., et al. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1131.1 · Cited by 527
“Models have shown that adaptive defense by prey is very often stabilizing, because increased predator abundance reduces effective prey availability, which tends to return predator numbers to their original level (Abrams 1984, Ives and Dobson 1987).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ives, A. R., & Dobson, A. P.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-447
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2071963339
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antipredator Behavior and the Population Dynamics of Simple Predator-Prey Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284719
- The paper
- Ives, A. R., & Dobson, A. P. (1987). Antipredator Behavior and the Population Dynamics of Simple Predator-Prey Systems. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.