The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Selection and Assortative Interactions
Abstract
Natural selection at all levels requires heritable phenotypic variation among units. At the group level, variation is often increased by reproduction coupled with limited dispersal, which forms the basis of kin selection and traditional group selection models. Assortative interactions are another possible mechanism for creating variation among groups that has received less attention. We present a series of models in which altruism is a continuously varying trait and individuals are free to choose their associates, based on information that is acquired through experience, observation, or cultural transmission. Assortative interactions can generate highly nonrandom variation among groups, favoring the evolution of altruism and other group-level adaptations among genealogically unrelated individuals. Altruism can evolve even when the initial phenotypic variation in altruism is not heritable, a form of genetic assimilation. The importance of assortative interactions depends in part on cognitive abilities that allow the phenotypes of social partners to be assessed. The minimal cognitive prerequisites are likely to be found in many species. The most cognitively sophisticated species, such as humans, might be highly group selected despite low genealogical relatedness among interacting individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Structured Demes and the Evolution of Group-Advantageous Traits
Wilson, D. S. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283146 · Cited by 363
Self-citation
Cited by
Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation
Henrich, J. (2004) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(03)00094-5 · Cited by 1,096
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice
Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11002202 · Cited by 668
Group Competition, Reproductive Leveling, and the Evolution of Human Altruism
Bowles, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134829 · Cited by 604
Homo Moralis--Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching
(2013) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10637 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, D. S., & Dugatkin, L. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336-351
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2063328978
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group Selection and Assortative Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/285993
- The paper
- Wilson, D. S., & Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Group Selection and Assortative Interactions. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/285993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.