Cited by 299Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

A Robust Determination of the Time Delay in 0957+561A, B and a Measurement of the Global Value of Hubble's Constant

Open access
Kundić, Tomislav, Turner, Edwin L., Colley, Wesley N., Gott III, J. Richard, Rhoads, James E., Wang, Yun, Bergeron, Louis E., Gloria, Karen A. +3 more·1997·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Continued photometric monitoring of the gravitational lens system 0957+561A, B in the g and r bands with the Apache Point Observatory (APO) 3.5 m telescope during 1996 shows a sharp g -band event in the trailing (B) image light curve at the precise time predicted in an earlier paper. The prediction was based on the observation of the event during 1995 in the leading (A) image and on a differential time delay of 415 days. This success confirms the so-called short delay, and the absence of any such feature at a delay near 540 days rejects the "long delay" for this system, thus resolving a long-standing controversy. A series of statistical analyses of our light-curve data yield a best-fit delay of 417 ± 3 days (95% confidence interval) and demonstrate that this result is quite robust against variations in the analysis technique, data subsamples, and assumed parametric relationship of the two light curves. Recent improvements in the modeling of the lens system (consisting of a galaxy plus a galaxy cluster) allow us to derive a value of the global value (at z = 0.36) of Hubble's constant H 0 using Refsdal's method, a simple and direct (single-step) distance determination based on experimentally verified and securely understood physics and geometry. The result is H 0 = 64 ± 13 km s -1 Mpc -1 (for Ω = 1), where this 95% confidence interval is dominantly due to remaining lens model uncertainties. However, it is reassuring that available observations of the lensing mass distribution overconstrain the model and thus provide an internal consistency check on its validity. W e argue that this determination of the extragalactic distance scale (10% accurate at 1 σ) is now of comparable quality, in terms of both statistical and systematic uncertainties, to those based on more conventional techniques. Finally, we briefly discuss the prospects for improved H 0 determinations using gravitational lenses, and some other possible implications and uses of the 0957+561A, B light curves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/304147

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time delays for quasars multiply lensed by clusters as a function of redshift are an independent test of dark energy.

    “Time delays for quasars multiply lensed by clusters as a function of redshift are an independent test of dark energy ( Kundi ć et al. 1997 ) .”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Kundić et al. 1997

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. P., Bernstein, G., Rhee, G., & Tyson, J. A. 1996, AJ, in Fischer, press R. 1984, A&A, 138,
  2. D., Subramanian, K., & Chitre, S. M. 1984, MNRAS, 210, Narasimha, 79 R. 1991, ApJ, 378, Narayan, L5 R., & Bartelmann, M. 1996, preprint, Narayan, astro-ph/9606001 · arXiv
  3. W. H., Rybicki, G. B., & Hewitt, J. N. 1992a, ApJ, 385, Press, 404

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kundić, T., Turner, E. L., Colley, W. N., Gott III, J. R., Rhoads, J. E., Wang, Y., Bergeron, L. E., Gloria, K. A., Long, D. C., Malhotra, S., & Wambsganss, J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (DE)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1997-06-10
Volume
482
Issue
1
Pages
75-82
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1990279104
Cited by
299
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
31.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9529120, 9419400, 19400)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
gravitational lensing, time delay, light curves, lens model, extragalactic distance scale, differential time delay, photometric monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review