The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cosmic Baryon Budget
Open accessAbstract
We present an estimate of the global budget of baryons in all states, with conservative estimates of the uncertainties, based on all relevant information we have been able to marshal. Most of the baryons today are still in the form of ionized gas, which contributes a mean density uncertain by a factor of about 4. Stars and their remnants are a relatively minor component, comprising for our best-guess plasma density only about 17% of the baryons, while populations contributing most of the blue starlight comprise less than 5%. The formation of galaxies and of stars within them appears to be a globally inefficient process. The sum over our budget, expressed as a fraction of the critical Einstein-de Sitter density, is in the range 0.007 ≲ Ω B ≲ 0.041, with a best guess of Ω B ~ 0.021 (at Hubble constant 70 km s -1 Mpc -1 ). The central value agrees with the prediction from the theory of light element production and with measures of the density of intergalactic plasma at redshift z ~ 3. This apparent concordance suggests that we may be close to a complete survey of the major states of the baryons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set
Fixsen, D. J., Cheng, E. S., Gales, J. M., Mather, J. C., Shafer, R. A., & Wright, E. L. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/178173 · Cited by 1,780 · cited 1×
“For example, the COBE limit on the Compton distortion of the microwave background spectrum, y < 1.5 × 10−5 (Fixsen et al. 1996), is produced by a Hubble length of gas at a mean density Ω = (T/106)−1h−1, so the bound on the y-distortion is not useful here.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Carroll, S. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1 · Cited by 2,650
Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Main Galaxy Sample
Strauss, M. A., Weinberg, D. H., Lupton, R. H., Narayanan, V. K., Annis, J., Bernardi, M., Blanton, M., Burles, S., Connolly, A. J., Dalcanton, J., et al. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/342343 · Cited by 1,909
Self-citationBertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 · Cited by 1,241
Chemical evolution with radial mixing
Schönrich, R., & Binney, J. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14750.x · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukugita, M., Hogan, C. J., & Peebles, P. J. E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-08-20
- Volume
- 503
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 518-530
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2097302093
- Cited by
- 1,211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cosmic Baryon Budget. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/306025
- The paper
- Fukugita, M., Hogan, C. J., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1998). The Cosmic Baryon Budget. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/306025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.