Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of a Live, Cold‐Passaged, Temperature‐Sensitive, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Candidate in Infancy

Wright, Peter F., Karron, Ruth A., Belshe, Robert B., Thompson, Juliette, Crowe, Jr., James E., Boyce, Thomas G., Halburnt, Lisa L., Reed, George W., Whitehead, Stephen S., Anderson, Edwin L., Wittek, Alec E., Casey, Roberta, Eichelberger, Maryna, Thumar, Bhagvanji, Randolph, Valerie B., Udem, Stephen A., Chanock, Robert M., Murphy, Brian R.·2000·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

A live-attenuated, intranasal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) candidate vaccine, cpts-248/404, was tested in phase 1 trials in 114 children, including 37 1-2-month-old infants-a target age for RSV vaccines. The cpts-248/404 vaccine was infectious at 104 and 105 plaque-forming units in RSV-naive children and was broadly immunogenic in children >6 months old. Serum and nasal antibody responses in 1-2 month olds were restricted to IgA, had a dominant response to RSV G protein, and had no increase in neutralizing activity. Nevertheless, there was restricted virus shedding on challenge with a second vaccine dose and preliminary evidence for protection from symptomatic disease on natural reexposure. The cpts-248/404 vaccine candidate did not cause fever or lower respiratory tract illness. In the youngest infants, however, cpts-248/404 was unacceptable because of upper respiratory tract congestion associated with peak virus recovery. A live attenuated RSV vaccine for the youngest infant will use cpts-248/404 modified by additional attenuating mutations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/315859

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Wright, P. F., Karron, R. A., Belshe, R. B., Thompson, J., Crowe, Jr., Boyce, T. G., Halburnt, L. L., Reed, G. W., Whitehead, S. S., Anderson, E. L., Wittek, A. E., Casey, R., Eichelberger, M., Thumar, B., Randolph, V. B., Udem, S. A., Chanock, R. M., & Murphy, B. R.
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2000-11
Volume
182
Issue
5
Pages
1331-1342
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2028532590
Cited by
307
References
3
FWCI
14.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of a Live, Cold‐Passaged, Temperature‐Sensitive, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Candidate in Infancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/315859
The paper
Wright, P. F., Karron, R. A., Belshe, R. B., Thompson, J., Crowe, Jr., Boyce, T. G., Halburnt, L. L., Reed, G. W., Whitehead, S. S., Anderson, E. L., Wittek, A. E., Casey, R., Eichelberger, M., Thumar, B., Randolph, V. B., Udem, S. A., Chanock, R. M., & Murphy, B. R. (2000). Evaluation of a Live, Cold‐Passaged, Temperature‐Sensitive, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Candidate in Infancy. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/315859

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.