Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical Properties of Bright Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System

Open access
Shimasaku, Kazuhiro, Fukugita, Masataka, Doi, Mamoru, Hamabe, Masaru, Ichikawa, Takashi, Okamura, Sadanori, Sekiguchi, Maki, Yasuda, Naoki, Brinkmann, Jon, Csabai, István, Ichikawa, Shin-Ichi, Ivezić, Zeljko, Kunszt, Peter Z., Schneider, Donald P., Szokoly, Gyula P., Watanabe, Masaru, York, Donald G.·2001·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We investigate the photometric properties of 456 bright galaxies using imaging data recorded during the commissioning phase of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Morphological classification is carried out by correlating results of several human classifiers. Our purpose is to examine the statistical properties of color indices, scale lengths, and concentration indices as functions of morphology for the SDSS photometric system. We find that u '- g ', g '- r ', and r '- i ' colors of SDSS galaxies match well with those expected from the synthetic calculation of spectroscopic energy distribution of template galaxies and with those transformed from UBVR C I C color data of nearby galaxies. The agreement is somewhat poor, however, for the i '- z ' color band, with a discrepancy of 0.1–0.2 mag. With the aid of the relation between surface brightness and radius obtained by Kent in 1985, we estimate the averages of the effective radius of early-type galaxies and the scale length of exponential disks both to be 2.6 kpc for L * galaxies. We find that the half-light radius of galaxies depends slightly on the color bands, consistent with the expected distribution of star-forming regions for late-type galaxies and with the known color gradient for early-type galaxies. We also show that the (inverse) concentration index, defined by the ratio of the half-light Petrosian radius to the 90% light Petrosian radius, correlates tightly with the morphological type; this index allows us to classify galaxies into early (E/S0) and late (spiral and irregular) types, allowing for a 15%–20% contamination from the opposite class compared with eye-classified morphology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/322094

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Shimasaku, K., Fukugita, M., Doi, M., Hamabe, M., Ichikawa, T., Okamura, S., Sekiguchi, M., Yasuda, N., Brinkmann, J., Csabai, I., Ichikawa, S.-I., Ivezić, Z., Kunszt, P. Z., Schneider, D. P., Szokoly, G. P., Watanabe, M., & York, D. G.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2001-09
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
1238-1250
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1509549320
Cited by
335
References
23
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Properties of Bright Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/322094
The paper
Shimasaku, K., Fukugita, M., Doi, M., Hamabe, M., Ichikawa, T., Okamura, S., Sekiguchi, M., Yasuda, N., Brinkmann, J., Csabai, I., Ichikawa, S.-I., Ivezić, Z., Kunszt, P. Z., Schneider, D. P., Szokoly, G. P., Watanabe, M., & York, D. G. (2001). Statistical Properties of Bright Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/322094

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.