Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Presupernova Evolution with Improved Rates for Weak Interactions

Open access
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., Martinez‐Pinedo, G., Langanke, K.·2001·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Recent shell-model calculations of weak-interaction rates for nuclei in the mass range A = 45-65 have resulted in substantial revisions to the hitherto standard set of Fuller, Fowler, & Newman (FFN). In particular, key electron-capture rates, such as that for 60 Co, are much smaller. We consider here the effects of these revised rates on the presupernova (post-oxygen burning) evolution of massive stars in the mass range 11-40 M ☉ . Moreover, we include, for the first time in models by our group, the effects of modern rates for beta decay in addition to electron capture and positron emission. Stars of 15, 25, and 40 M ☉ are examined in detail using both the full FFN rate set and the revised rates. An additional finely spaced (in mass) grid of 34 models is also calculated in order to give the systematics of iron core and silicon core masses. Values for the central electron mole number at the time of iron core collapse in the new models are typically larger, by Δ Y e = 0.005-0.015, than those of Woosley & Weaver, with a tendency for the more massive models to display larger differences. About half of this change is a consequence of including beta decay; the other half, the result of the smaller rates for electron capture. Unlike what might be expected solely on basis of the larger Y e values, the new iron core masses are systematically smaller owing to a decrease in the entropy in the outer iron core. The changes in iron core mass range from zero to 0.1 M ☉ (larger changes for high-mass stars). It would be erroneous however to estimate the facility of exploding these new models based solely upon their iron core mass since the entire core structure is altered and the density change is not so different as the adjustments in composition might suggest. We also observe, as predicted by Aufderheide et al., a tendency toward beta equilibrium just prior to the collapse of the core, and the subsequent loss of that equilibrium as core collapse proceeds. This tendency is more pronounced in the 15 M ☉ model than in the heavier stars. We discuss the key weak reaction rates, both beta decay and electron capture, responsible for the evolution of Y e and make suggestions for future measurements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/324092

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., Martinez‐Pinedo, G., & Langanke, K.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2001-10-10
Volume
560
Issue
1
Pages
307-325
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2026081469
Cited by
200
References
1
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Presupernova Evolution with Improved Rates for Weak Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324092
The paper
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E., Martinez‐Pinedo, G., & Langanke, K. (2001). Presupernova Evolution with Improved Rates for Weak Interactions. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/324092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.