The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Test of the Collisional Dark Matter Hypothesis from Cluster Lensing
Open accessAbstract
Spergel & Steinhardt proposed the possibility that dark matter particles are self-interacting as a solution to two discrepancies between the predictions of cold dark matter models and observations: First, the observed dark matter distribution in some dwarf galaxies has large, constant-density cores, as opposed to the predicted central cusps; and second, small satellites of normal galaxies are much less abundant than predicted. The dark matter self-interaction would produce isothermal cores in halos and expel the dark matter particles from dwarfs orbiting in large halos. Another consequence of the model is that halos should become spherical once most particles have interacted. Several observations show that the mass distribution in relaxed clusters of galaxies is elliptical. Here, I discuss in particular gravitational lensing in the cluster MS 2137-23, where the ellipticity of the dark matter distribution can be measured to a small radius, r ~ 70 kpc, suggesting that most dark matter particles in clusters outside this radius do not collide during the characteristic age of clusters. If true, this implies that any dark matter self-interaction with a cross section independent of velocity is too weak to have affected the observed density profiles in the dark-matter dominated dwarf galaxies, or to have facilitated the destruction of dwarf satellites in galactic halos. If s x is the cross section and m x the mass of the dark matter particle, then s x / m x < 10 -25.5 cm 2 GeV -1 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Cited by
Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection
Feng, J. L. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 · Cited by 1,448
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Clowe, D., Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Murray, S., & Tucker, W. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383178 · Cited by 942
Randall, S. W., Markevitch, M., Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A. H., & Bradač, M. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/587859 · Cited by 775
Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Miralda‐Escude, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 564
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-64
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2037345068
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Test of the Collisional Dark Matter Hypothesis from Cluster Lensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324138
- The paper
- Miralda‐Escude, J. (2002). A Test of the Collisional Dark Matter Hypothesis from Cluster Lensing. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/324138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.