The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men
Abstract
Using data from a 1999 national RDD survey (N = 1,335), this article examines gender gaps in heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and a variety of topics related to homosexuality. Attitudes toward lesbians differed from attitudes toward gay men in several areas, and significant differences were observed between male and female heterosexual respondents. Survey participants generally were more likely to regard gay men as mentally ill, supported adoption rights for lesbians more than for gay men, and had more negative personal reactions to gay men than to lesbians. Overall, heterosexual women were more supportive than men of employment protection and adoption rights for gay people, more willing to extend employee benefits to same-sex couples, and less likely to hold stereotypical beliefs about gay people. Heterosexual men's negative reactions to gay men were at the root of these gender differences. Of all respondent-by-target combinations, heterosexual men were the least supportive of recognition of same-sex relationships and adoption rights for gay men, most likely to believe that gay men are mentally ill and molest children, and most negative in their affective reactions to gay men. Heterosexual men's response patterns were affected by item order, suggesting possible gender differences in the cognitive organization of attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. The findings demonstrate the importance of differentiating lesbians from gay men as attitude targets in survey research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HEREK, G. M. (1986) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276486029005005 · Cited by 496
Self-citation
Cited by
Beyond “Homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century
Herek, G. M. (2004) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6 · Cited by 1,029
Self-citationBostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., & McCabe, S. E. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.152942 · Cited by 829
Heterosexuals' attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States
Herek, G. M. (2002) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490209552150 · Cited by 676
Self-citationThe SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination
Dovidio, J., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781446200919 · Cited by 546
(2007) · Cited by 350
Sexual stigma: putting sexual minority health issues in context
Herek, G. M., Chopp, R., & Strohl, D. (2007) · The Health of Sexual Minorities · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4_8 · Cited by 206
Sexual orientation change efforts among current or former LDS church members
Dehlin, J. P., Galliher, R. V., Bradshaw, W. S., Hyde, D. C., & Crowell, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000011 · Cited by 111
On the enduring relationship between masculinity and homophobia
Diefendorf, S., & Bridges, T. (2020) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460719876843 · Cited by 91
Gender, Sexual Prejudice and Sport Participation: Implications for Sexual Minorities
Sartore, M. L., & Cunningham, G. B. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9502-7 · Cited by 85
Dragowski, E. A., Halkitis, P. N., Grossman, A. H., & D'Augelli, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services · doi:10.1080/10538720.2010.541028 · Cited by 82
Gender-typed behaviors and school adjustment
Ueno, K., & McWilliams, S. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9839-6 · Cited by 35
Mishel, E., Bridges, T., & Caudillo, M. L. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/4se75 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Herek, G. M.
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-66
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5331
- OpenAlex
- W2152409773
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.