The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22
Open accessAbstract
In recent decades, comparative chromosomal banding, chromosome painting, and gene-order studies have shown strong conservation of gross chromosome structure and gene order in mammals. However, findings from the human genome sequence suggest an unprecedented degree of recent (<35 million years ago) segmental duplication. This dynamism of segmental duplications has important implications in disease and evolution. Here we present a chromosome-wide view of the structure and evolution of the most highly homologous duplications (> or = 1 kb and > or = 90%) on chromosome 22. Overall, 10.8% (3.7/33.8 Mb) of chromosome 22 is duplicated, with an average sequence identity of 95.4%. To organize the duplications into tractable units, intron-exon structure and well-defined duplication boundaries were used to define 78 duplicated modules (minimally shared evolutionary segments) with 157 copies on chromosome 22. Analysis of these modules provides evidence for the creation or modification of 11 novel transcripts. Comparative FISH analyses of human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and macaque reveal qualitative and quantitative differences in the distribution of these duplications--consistent with their recent origin. Several duplications appear to be human specific, including a approximately 400-kb duplication (99.4%-99.8% sequence identity) that transposed from chromosome 14 to the most proximal pericentromeric region of chromosome 22. Experimental and in silico data further support a pericentromeric gradient of duplications where the most recent duplications transpose adjacent to the centromere. Taken together, these data suggest that segmental duplications have been an ongoing process of primate genome evolution, contributing to recent gene innovation and the dynamic transformation of genome architecture within and among closely related species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting.
Jauch, A., Wienberg, J., Stanyon, R., Arnold, N., Tofanelli, S., Ishida, T., & Cremer, T. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.18.8611 · Cited by 310
Eichler, E. (1997) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/6.7.991 · Cited by 143
Self-citationExon shuffling and other ways of module exchange
Patthy, L. (1996) · Matrix Biology · doi:10.1016/s0945-053x(96)90131-6 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03001 · Cited by 4,971
McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Sullivan, K. E., Marino, B., Philip, N., Swillen, A., Vorstman, J. A. S., Zackai, E. H., Emanuel, B. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Morrow, B. E., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.71 · Cited by 2,236
The DNA sequence of human chromosome 7
Hillier, L. W., Fulton, R. S., Fulton, L. A., Graves, T. A., Pepin, K. H., Wagner-McPherson, C., Layman, D., Maas, J., Jaeger, S., Walker, R., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01782 · Cited by 285
Self-citationMutational and selective effects on copy-number variants in the human genome
Cooper, G. M., Nickerson, D. A., & Eichler, E. E. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2054 · Cited by 280
Self-citationLineage-Specific Gene Duplication and Loss in Human and Great Ape Evolution
Fortna, A., Kim, Y., MacLaren, E., Marshall, K., Hahn, G., Meltesen, L., Brenton, M., Hink, R., Burgers, S., Hernandez-Boussard, T., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020207 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Viggiano, L., Misceo, D., Horvath, J. E., Archidiacono, N., Schwartz, S., Rocchi, M., & Eichler, E. E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-100
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002760270
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338458
- The paper
- Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Viggiano, L., Misceo, D., Horvath, J. E., Archidiacono, N., Schwartz, S., Rocchi, M., & Eichler, E. E. (2002). Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22. The American Journal of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1086/338458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.