Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22

Open access
Bailey, Jeffrey A., Yavor, Amy M., Viggiano, Luigi, Misceo, Doriana, Horvath, Juliann E., Archidiacono, Nicoletta, Schwartz, Stuart, Rocchi, Mariano, Eichler, Evan E.·2002·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

In recent decades, comparative chromosomal banding, chromosome painting, and gene-order studies have shown strong conservation of gross chromosome structure and gene order in mammals. However, findings from the human genome sequence suggest an unprecedented degree of recent (<35 million years ago) segmental duplication. This dynamism of segmental duplications has important implications in disease and evolution. Here we present a chromosome-wide view of the structure and evolution of the most highly homologous duplications (> or = 1 kb and > or = 90%) on chromosome 22. Overall, 10.8% (3.7/33.8 Mb) of chromosome 22 is duplicated, with an average sequence identity of 95.4%. To organize the duplications into tractable units, intron-exon structure and well-defined duplication boundaries were used to define 78 duplicated modules (minimally shared evolutionary segments) with 157 copies on chromosome 22. Analysis of these modules provides evidence for the creation or modification of 11 novel transcripts. Comparative FISH analyses of human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and macaque reveal qualitative and quantitative differences in the distribution of these duplications--consistent with their recent origin. Several duplications appear to be human specific, including a approximately 400-kb duplication (99.4%-99.8% sequence identity) that transposed from chromosome 14 to the most proximal pericentromeric region of chromosome 22. Experimental and in silico data further support a pericentromeric gradient of duplications where the most recent duplications transpose adjacent to the centromere. Taken together, these data suggest that segmental duplications have been an ongoing process of primate genome evolution, contributing to recent gene innovation and the dynamic transformation of genome architecture within and among closely related species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/338458

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Viggiano, L., Misceo, D., Horvath, J. E., Archidiacono, N., Schwartz, S., Rocchi, M., & Eichler, E. E.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
83-100
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002760270
Cited by
174
References
7
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338458
The paper
Bailey, J. A., Yavor, A. M., Viggiano, L., Misceo, D., Horvath, J. E., Archidiacono, N., Schwartz, S., Rocchi, M., & Eichler, E. E. (2002). Human-Specific Duplication and Mosaic Transcripts: The Recent Paralogous Structure of Chromosome 22. The American Journal of Human Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1086/338458

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.