Cited by 84Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. I. Description of Methods and Initial Results

Open access
Millis, R. L., Buie, M. W., Wasserman, L. H., Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., Wagner, R. M.·2002·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We report here initial results of the Deep Ecliptic Survey, an ongoing new search for Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) and Centaurs using the 8K × 8K Mosaic CCD array on the 4 m Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory. Within the interval covered in this paper, useful observations were obtained during seven nights in 1998 October and November, 1999 April, and 2000 February. We used a novel technique to efficiently find and determine positions of moving objects. Sixty-nine KBOs and Centaurs with apparent magnitudes between 20.6 and approximately the 24th magnitude were discovered. Nine or 10 of the newly discovered KBOs appear to be in the 3 : 2 mean motion resonance with Neptune, and four appear to be scattered-disk objects. Three objects were found that may be in the 4 : 3 resonance. Sixty-two of the objects reported here have been observed on at least one additional night and have received designations. Our own follow-up astrometry was done primarily with the WIYN 3.5 m telescope in queue-scheduled mode and with the Steward Observatory 90 inch (2.3 m) telescope. Others, using a variety of telescopes, recovered a significant number of our objects. Although not a primary objective of the survey, positions of all main-belt asteroids, Trojan asteroids, and nearby fast-moving asteroids seen in our data also have been determined, and most have been reported to the Minor Planet Center. Through simulations and analysis of the existing KBO database, we have investigated the uncertainty to be expected in various KBO orbital parameters as a function of the extent of the astrometric coverage. The results indicate that the heliocentric distance of an object and the inclination of its orbit can be narrowly constrained with observations from a single apparition. Accurate determination of semimajor axis and eccentricity, on the other hand, requires astrometric data extending over additional apparitions. Based on the observed distribution of orbital inclinations in our sample, we have estimated the true distribution of orbital inclinations in the Kuiper belt and find it to be similar to that of the short-period comets. This result is consistent with the commonly held belief that the Kuiper belt is the source region of the short-period comets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/339481

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most wide-field surveys of the Kuiper belt have not been sensitive to sky motions smaller than about 1 arcsecond per hour.

    “While most wide-field surveys of the Kuiper belt have not been sensitive to sky motions smaller than about 1 arcsecond per hour (i.e., Millis et al. 2002;Brown 2008;Petit et al. 2011)”

    From Observational constraints on the orbit and location of Planet Nine in the outer solar system (2016) · cites this paper as Millis et al. 2002

    Section 2.3 gives a typical apparent motion of 2–3 arcseconds per hour for main-belt Kuiper belt objects near opposition, but that is not a survey sensitivity limit. Sections 2.6 and 3 describe survey exposures and detection methods; neither establishes that most wide-field surveys were insensitive below about 1 arcsecond per hour. Searches for slow-motion detection limits found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [25]25. ---. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, & S. S. Russell (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press)
  2. [35]35. Muller, G. P., Reed, R., Armandroff, T., Boroson, T. A., & Jacoby, G. H. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3355, 577
  3. [36]36. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. 1988, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
  4. [41]41. Trujillo, C. A. 2000, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Hawaii

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millis, R. L., Buie, M. W., Wasserman, L. H., Elliot, J. L., Kern, S. D., & Wagner, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2002-04
Volume
123
Issue
4
Pages
2083-2109
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2069295619
Cited by
84
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
Kuiper belt objects, centaurs, trans-Neptunian objects, 3:2 mean motion resonance, scattered disk objects, astrometry, orbital elements, orbital inclination distribution, short-period comets, main-belt asteroid, Trojans, moving object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review