The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding
Abstract
comments. Generous and stimulating comments by the editors and reviewers of this paper are gratefully acknowledged. 2 Brands are today under attack by an emerging countercultural movement. This study builds a dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding that explains the rise of this movement and its potential effects. Results of an interpretive study challenge existing theories of consumer resistance. To develop an alternative model, I first trace the rise of the modern cultural engineering paradigm of branding, premised upon a consumer culture that granted marketers cultural authority. Intrinsic contradictions erased its efficacy. Next I describe the current postmodern consumer culture, which is premised upon the pursuit of personal sovereignty through brands. I detail five postmodern branding techniques that are premised upon the principle that brands are authentic cultural resources. Postmodern branding is now giving rise to new contradictions that have flamed the anti-branding sentiment sweeping Western countries. I detail these contradictions and project that they will give rise to a new post postmodern branding paradigm premised upon brands as citizen-artists. 3 The old political battles that have consumed humankind during most of the twentieth
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Burawoy, M. (1998) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00040 · Cited by 2,916
(2003) · doi:10.4324/9780203449813 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303258971 · Cited by 1,873
Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008 · Cited by 1,452
Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale
Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,084
Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology
Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/425104 · Cited by 1,033
Metadata
- Authors
- Holt, D. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-90
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2045269804
- Cited by
- 1,951
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 115.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/339922
- The paper
- Holt, D. B. (2002). Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectical Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/339922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.