The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Animals
Abstract
Food animals in the United States are often exposed to antimicrobials to treat and prevent infectious disease or to promote growth. Many of these antimicrobials are identical to or closely resemble drugs used in humans. Precise figures for the quantity of antimicrobials used in animals are not publicly available in the United States, and estimates vary widely. Antimicrobial resistance has emerged in zoonotic enteropathogens (e.g., Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp.), commensal bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli, enterococci), and bacterial pathogens of animals (e.g., Pasteurella, Actinobacillus spp.), but the prevalence of resistance varies. Antimicrobial resistance emerges from the use of antimicrobials in animals and the subsequent transfer of resistance genes and bacteria among animals and animal products and the environment. To slow the development of resistance, some countries have restricted antimicrobial use in feed, and some groups advocate similar measures in the United States. Alternatives to growth-promoting and prophylactic uses of antimicrobials in agriculture include improved management practices, wider use of vaccines, and introduction of probiotics. Monitoring programs, prudent use guidelines, and educational campaigns provide approaches to minimize the further development of antimicrobial resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bager, F., Madsen, M., Christensen, J., & Aarestrup, F. M. (1997) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1 · Cited by 426
Dunlop, R. H., McEwen, S. A., Meek, A. H., Clarke, R. C., Black, W. D., & Friendship, R. M. (1998) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 · Cited by 109
Self-citation
Cited by
A Review on Antibiotic Resistance: Alarm Bells are Ringing
Zaman, S. B., Hussain, M. A., Nye, R., Mehta, V., Mamun, K. T., & Hossain, N. (2017) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.1403 · Cited by 854
Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook
Aslam, B., Khurshid, M., Arshad, M. I., Muzammil, S., Rasool, M., Yasmeen, N., Shah, T., Chaudhry, T. H., Rasool, M. H., Shahid, A., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510 · Cited by 609
Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses
Van, T. T. H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P. M., & Coloe, P. J. (2020) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031 · Cited by 451
V. T. Nair, D., Venkitanarayanan, K., & Kollanoor Johny, A. (2018) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods7100167 · Cited by 336
Sharma, C., Rokana, N., Chandra, M., Singh, B. P., Gulhane, R. D., Gill, J. P. S., Ray, P., Puniya, A. K., & Panwar, H. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00237 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- McEwen, S. A., & Fedorka‐Cray, P. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- s3
- Pages
- S93-S106
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2101798664
- Cited by
- 983
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/340246
- The paper
- McEwen, S. A., & Fedorka‐Cray, P. J. (2002). Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Animals. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/340246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.