Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 575

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Understanding of Large Magellanic Cloud Structure, Dynamics, and Orbit from Carbon Star Kinematics

Open access
van der Marel, Roeland P., Alves, David R., Hardy, Eduardo, Suntzeff, Nicholas B.·2002·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We formulate a new and coherent understanding of the structure and dynamics of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and its orbit around and interaction with the Milky Way. Much of our understanding of these issues hinges on studies of the LMC line-of-sight kinematics. The observed velocity field includes contributions from the LMC rotation curve V ( R '), the LMC transverse velocity vector v t , and the rate of inclination change di / dt . All previous studies have assumed di / dt = 0. We show that this is incorrect and that, combined with uncertainties in v t , this has led to incorrect estimates of many important structural parameters of the LMC. We derive general expressions for the velocity field that we fit to kinematic data for 1041 carbon stars. We calculate v t by compiling and improving LMC proper-motion measurements from the literature, and we show that for known v t , all other model parameters are uniquely determined by the data. The position angle of the line of nodes is Θ = 129 9 ± 6 0, consistent with the value determined geometrically by van der Marel & Cioni in 2001. The rate of inclination change is di / dt = -0.37 ± 0.22 mas yr -1 = -103° ± 61° Gyr -1 . This is similar in magnitude to predictions from N -body simulations by M. Weinberg, which predict LMC disk precession and nutation due to Milky Way tidal torques. The LMC rotation curve V ( R ') has amplitude 49.8 ± 15.9 km s -1 . This is 40% lower than what has previously (and incorrectly) been inferred from studies of H I, carbon stars, and other tracers. The line-of-sight velocity dispersion has an average value σ = 20.2 ± 0.5 km s -1 , with little variation as a function of radius. The dynamical center of the carbon stars is consistent with the center of the bar and the center of the outer isophotes, but it is offset by 1 2 ± 0 6 from the kinematic center of the H I. The enclosed mass inside the last data point is M LMC (8.9 kpc) = (8.7 ± 4.3) × 10 9 M ⊙ , more than half of which is due to a dark halo. The LMC has a considerable vertical thickness; its V /σ = 2.9 ± 0.9 is less than the value for the Milky Way's thick disk ( V /σ ≈ 3.9). Simple arguments for models stratified on spheroids indicate that the (out of plane) axial ratio could be ∼0.3 or larger. Isothermal disk models for the observed velocity dispersion profile confirm the finding of Alves & Nelson that the scale height must increase with radius. A substantial thickness to the LMC disk is consistent with the simulations of Weinberg, which predict LMC disk thickening due to Milky Way tidal forces. These affect LMC structure even inside the LMC's tidal radius, which we calculate to be r t = 15.0 ± 4.5 kpc (i.e., 17 1 ± 5 1). The new insights into LMC structure need not significantly alter existing predictions for the LMC's self-lensing optical depth, which to lowest order depends only on σ. The compiled proper-motion data imply an LMC transverse velocity v t = 406 km s -1 in the direction of position angle 78 7 (with errors of ∼40 km s -1 in each coordinate). This can be combined with the observed systemic line-of-sight velocity, v sys = 262.2 ± 3.4 km s -1 , to calculate the LMC velocity in the Galactocentric rest frame. This yields v LMC = 293 ± 39 km s -1 , with radial and tangential components v LMC,rad = 84 ± 7 km s -1 and v LMC,tan = 281 ± 41 km s -1 , respectively. This is consistent with the range of velocities that has been predicted by models for the Magellanic Stream. The implied orbit of the LMC has an apocenter-to-pericenter distance ratio ∼2.5 : 1, a perigalactic distance ∼45 kpc, and a present orbital period around the Milky Way of ∼1.5 Gyr. The constraint that the LMC is bound to the Milky Way provides a robust limit on the minimum mass and extent of the Milky Way dark halo: M MW ≥ 4.3 × 10 11 M ⊙ and r h ≥ 39 kpc (68.3% confidence). Finally, we present predictions for the LMC proper-motion velocity field, and we discuss how measurements of this may lead to kinematic distance estimates for the LMC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/343775

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 575

Metadata

Authors
van der Marel, R. P., Alves, D. R., Hardy, E., & Suntzeff, N. B.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2002-11
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
2639-2663
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2003935627
Cited by
575
References
0
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Understanding of Large Magellanic Cloud Structure, Dynamics, and Orbit from Carbon Star Kinematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/343775
The paper
van der Marel, R. P., Alves, D. R., Hardy, E., & Suntzeff, N. B. (2002). New Understanding of Large Magellanic Cloud Structure, Dynamics, and Orbit from Carbon Star Kinematics. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/343775

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.