Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Halo Substructure and the Power Spectrum

Open access
Zentner, Andrew R., Bullock, James S.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present a semianalytic model to investigate the merger history, destruction rate, and survival probability of substructure in hierarchically formed dark matter halos and use it to study the substructure content of halos as a function of input primordial power spectrum. For a standard cold dark matter "concordance" cosmology (ΛCDM; n = 1, σ 8 = 0.95) we successfully reproduce the subhalo velocity function and radial distribution profile seen in N -body simulations and determine that the rate of merging and disruption peaks ~10-12 Gyr in the past for Milky Way-like halos, while surviving substructures are typically accreted within the last ~0-8 Gyr. We explore power spectra with normalizations and spectral "tilts" spanning the ranges σ 8 ≃ 1-0.65 and n ≃ 1-0.8, and include a "running-index" model with dn / d ln k = -0.03 similar to the best-fit model discussed in the first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) report. We investigate spectra with truncated small-scale power, including a broken-scale inflation model and three warm dark matter cases with m W = 0.75-3.0 keV. We find that the mass fraction in substructure is relatively insensitive to the tilt and overall normalization of the primordial power spectrum. All of the CDM-type models yield projected substructure mass fractions that are consistent with, but on the low side, of published estimates from strong lens systems: f 9 = 0.4%-1.5% (64th percentile) for subhalos smaller than 10 9 M ☉ within projected cylinders of radius r < 10 kpc. Truncated models produce significantly smaller fractions, f 9 = 0.02%-0.2% for m W ≃ 1 keV, and are disfavored by lensing estimates. This suggests that lensing and similar probes can provide a robust test of the CDM paradigm and a powerful constraint on broken-scale inflation/warm particle masses, including masses larger than the ~1 keV upper limits of previous studies. We compare our predicted subhalo velocity functions with the dwarf satellite population of the Milky Way. Assuming that dwarfs have isotropic velocity dispersions, we find that the standard n = 1 model overpredicts the number of Milky Way satellites at V max ≲ 35 km s -1 , as expected. Models with less small-scale power do better because subhalos are less concentrated and the mapping between observed velocity dispersion and halo V max is significantly altered. The running-index model, or a fixed tilt with σ 8 ~ 0.75, can account for the local dwarfs without the need for differential feedback (for V max ≳ 20 km s -1 ); however, these comparisons depend sensitively on the assumption of isotropic velocities in satellite galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/378797

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 149 references

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Zentner, A. R., & Bullock, J. S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2003-11-20
Volume
598
Issue
1
Pages
49-72
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2963765929
Cited by
429
References
149
FWCI
18.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halo Substructure and the Power Spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378797
The paper
Zentner, A. R., & Bullock, J. S. (2003). Halo Substructure and the Power Spectrum. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/378797

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.