Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,111

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z= 0.1

Open access
Blanton, Michael R., Hogg, David W., Bahcall, Neta A., Brinkmann, J., Britton, Malcolm, Connolly, Andrew J., Csabai, Istvan, Fukugita, Masataka, Loveday, Jon, Meiksin, Avery, Munn, Jeffrey A., Nichol, R. C., Okamura, Sadanori, Quinn, Thomas, Schneider, Donald P., Shimasaku, Kazuhiro, Strauss, Michael A., Tegmark, Max, Vogeley, Michael S., Weinberg, David H.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Using a catalog of 147,986 galaxy redshifts and fluxes from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we measure the galaxy luminosity density at z = 0.1 in five optical bandpasses corresponding to the SDSS bandpasses shifted to match their rest-frame shape at z = 0.1. We denote the bands 0.1 u , 0.1 g , 0.1 r , 0.1 i , 0.1 z with λ eff = (3216, 4240, 5595, 6792, 8111 Å), respectively. To estimate the luminosity function, we use a maximum likelihood method that allows for a general form for the shape of the luminosity function, fits for simple luminosity and number evolution, incorporates the flux uncertainties, and accounts for the flux limits of the survey. We find luminosity densities at z = 0.1 expressed in absolute AB magnitudes in a Mpc 3 to be (-14.10 ± 0.15, -15.18 ± 0.03, -15.90 ± 0.03, -16.24 ± 0.03, -16.56 ± 0.02) in ( 0.1 u , 0.1 g , 0.1 r , 0.1 i , 0.1 z ), respectively, for a cosmological model with Ω 0 = 0.3, Ω Λ = 0.7, and h = 1 and using SDSS Petrosian magnitudes. Similar results are obtained using Sérsic model magnitudes, suggesting that flux from outside the Petrosian apertures is not a major correction. In the 0.1 r band, the best-fit Schechter function to our results has ϕ * = (1.49 ± 0.04) × 10 -2 h 3 Mpc -3 , M * - 5 log 10 h = -20.44 ± 0.01, and α = -1.05 ± 0.01. In solar luminosities, the luminosity density in 0.1 r is (1.84 ± 0.04) × 10 8 h L 0.1 r ,☉ Mpc -3 . Our results in the 0.1 g band are consistent with other estimates of the luminosity density, from the Two-Degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey and the Millennium Galaxy Catalog. They represent a substantial change (~0.5 mag) from earlier SDSS luminosity density results based on commissioning data, almost entirely because of the inclusion of evolution in the luminosity function model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/375776

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,111

Metadata

Authors
Blanton, M. R., Hogg, D. W., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Britton, M., Connolly, A. J., Csabai, I., Fukugita, M., Loveday, J., Meiksin, A., Munn, J. A., Nichol, R. C., Okamura, S., Quinn, T., Schneider, D. P., Shimasaku, K., Strauss, M. A., Tegmark, M., Vogeley, M. S., & Weinberg, D. H.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2003-08
Volume
592
Issue
2
Pages
819-838
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2048116537
Cited by
1,111
References
4
FWCI
43.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z= 0.1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/375776
The paper
Blanton, M. R., Hogg, D. W., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Britton, M., Connolly, A. J., Csabai, I., Fukugita, M., Loveday, J., Meiksin, A., Munn, J. A., Nichol, R. C., Okamura, S., Quinn, T., Schneider, D. P., Shimasaku, K., Strauss, M. A., Tegmark, M., Vogeley, M. S., & Weinberg, D. H. (2003). The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z= 0.1. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/375776

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.