Cited by 659Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Open access
Willett, Kyle W., Lintott, Chris J., Bamford, Steven P., Masters, Karen L., Simmons, Brooke D., Casteels, Kevin R. V., Edmondson, Edward M., Fortson, Lucy F. +10 more·2013·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present the data release for Galaxy Zoo 2 (GZ2), a citizen science project with more than 16 million morphological classifications of 304,122 galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Morphology is a powerful probe for quantifying a galaxy's dynamical history; however, automatic classifications of morphology (either by computer analysis of images or by using other physical parameters as proxies) still have drawbacks when compared to visual inspection. The large number of images available in current surveys makes visual inspection of each galaxy impractical for individual astronomers. GZ2 uses classifications from volunteer citizen scientists to measure morphologies for all galaxies in the DR7 Legacy survey with m_r>17, in addition to deeper images from SDSS Stripe 82. While the original Galaxy Zoo project identified galaxies as early-types, late-types, or mergers, GZ2 measures finer morphological features. These include bars, bulges, and the shapes of edge-on disks, as well as quantifying the relative strengths of galactic bulges and spiral arms. This paper presents the full public data release for the project, including measures of accuracy and bias. The majority (>90%) of GZ2 classifications agree with those made by professional astronomers, especially for morphological T-types, strong bars, and arm curvature. Both the raw and reduced data products can be obtained in electronic format at http://data.galaxyzoo.org .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stt1458

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GZ2 achieved morphological classifications of 304,122 SDSS galaxies.

    “GZ2 (Willett et al. 2013), the successor to GZ, is focused on more fine-grained features, and in total achieved morphological classifications of 304,122 SDSS galaxies.”

    From Self-supervised Representation Learning for Astronomical Images (2021) · cites this paper as Willett et al. 2013

  • Galaxy Zoo 2 achieved 16 million morphological classifications of 304,122 galaxies drawn from SDSS with r < 17 and petroR90_r > 3 arcsec.

    “Galaxy Zoo 2 (Willett et al. 2013) achieved 16 million morphological classifications of 304,122 galaxies drawn from SDSS with r &lt; 17 and petroR90 r 6 &gt; 3 arcsec, collected via a web-based interface.”

    From Self-supervised Representation Learning for Astronomical Images (2021) · cites this paper as Willett et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ahn C. P. et al., 2013, ArXiv e-prints Annis J. et al., 2011, ArXiv e-prints
  2. Buta R., Corwin, Jr. H. G., Odewahn S. C., 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 275, Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Peturbations, Athanassoula E., Bosma A., Mujica R., eds., p. 102
  3. Buta R. J., 2013, Galaxy Morphology, Oswalt T. D., Keel W. C., eds., Springer
  4. Davis D., Hayes W., 2013, ArXiv e-prints
  5. Hinshaw G. et al., 2012, ArXiv e-prints
  6. Nieto-Santisteban M. A., Szalay A. S., Gray J., 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 314, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, Ochsenbein F., Allen M. G., Egret D., eds., p. 666
  7. Taylor M. B., 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, Shopbell P., Britton M., Ebert R., eds., p. 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willett, K. W., Lintott, C. J., Bamford, S. P., Masters, K. L., Simmons, B. D., Casteels, K. R. V., Edmondson, E. M., Fortson, L. F., Kaviraj, S., Keel, W. C., Melvin, T., Nichol, R. C., Raddick, M. J., Schawinski, K., Simpson, R. J., Skibba, R. A., Smith, A. M., & Thomas, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Adler Planetarium (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • South East Physics Network (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Institut de Ciències del Cosmos (ES)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Willett, Kyle W.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2013-09-16
Volume
435
Issue
4
Pages
2835-2860
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2023037133
Cited by
659
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0941610, PP00P2_138979, NCC5-626)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NCC5626)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Princeton University
  • Ohio State University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Drexel University
  • Universität Basel
  • University of Portsmouth
  • New Mexico State University
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (PP00P2 138979/1, PP00P2, 138979)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/H007156/1, ST/J500665/1, ST/J001465/1, ST/K00090X/1, K00090X/1, ST/I001212/1)
  • U.S. Naval Observatory
  • Fermilab
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Galaxy Zoo 2, galaxy morphology, citizen science, visual categorization, Sloan Digital Sky Survey, SDSS Stripe 82, galaxy bulges, bars, spiral arms, edge-on disk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review