Cited by 219Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isotopic Compositions of Strontium, Zirconium, Molybdenum, and Barium in Single Presolar SiC Grains and Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

Open access
Lugaro, Maria, Davis, Andrew M., Gallino, Roberto, Pellin, Michael J., Straniero, Oscar, Kappeler, Franz·2003·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The strontium, zirconium, molybdenum, and barium isotopic compositions predicted in the mass-losing envelopes of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars of solar metallicity and mass 1.5, 3, and 5 M ☉ are discussed and compared with recent measurements in single presolar silicon carbide (SiC) grains from the Murchison meteorite. Heavy-element nucleosynthesis via the s -process occurs in the helium intershell, the region between the helium-burning and hydrogen-burning shells, producing heavy elements beyond iron. After a limited number of thermal runaways of the helium shell (thermal pulses), at the quenching of each instability, the convective envelope penetrates into the top layers of the helium intershell (third dredge-up), mixing newly synthesized 12 C and s -process material to the stellar surface. Eventually, the envelope becomes carbon-rich (C ≥ O), a necessary condition for SiC grains to condense. In the helium intershell, neutrons are released by (α, n ) reactions on 13 C and 22 Ne during interpulse phases and the thermal pulses, respectively. A 13 C pocket is assumed to form in a tiny region in the top layers of the helium intershell by injection of a small amount of protons from the envelope during each third dredge-up episode. This 13 C then burns radiately during the interpulse phase. The average neutron density produced is low, but of long duration, so the total neutron exposure is high. We have explored a large range of possible 13 C abundances in the pocket. In low-mass AGB stars (1.5 M ☉ ≤ M ≤ 4 M ☉ ), a second small burst of neutrons is released by marginal 22 Ne burning in the thermal pulse. The neutron density reaches quite a high peak value but is of short duration, so the neutron exposure is low. In intermediate-mass AGB stars (4 M ☉ < M ≤ 8 M ☉ ), the 22 Ne neutron source is more efficiently activated. The neutron capture process has been followed with a postprocessing code that considers all relevant nuclei from 4 He to 210 Po. The predicted isotopic compositions of strontium, zirconium, molybdenum, and barium in the envelopes of low-mass AGB stars of solar metallicity are in agreement with the isotopic ratios measured in individual presolar SiC grains, whereas predictions for intermediate-mass stars exclude them as the sources of these grains. A multiplicity of low-mass AGB stars with metallicity around solar, having different masses and experiencing different neutron exposures, are required to account for the measured spread in heavy-element isotopic compositions among single presolar SiC grains. The range of neutron exposures corresponds, on average, to a lower mean neutron exposure than that required to reproduce the s -process main component in the solar system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/376442

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a 3 M⊙ star, such overshoot produces Zr isotopic ratios inconsistent with those measured in stardust grains.

    “While it has been shown for a 3 M ⊙ star that such overshoot produces Zr isotopic ratios inconsistent with those measured in stardust grains (Lugaro et al. 2003), other observations such as oxygen in post-AGB stars suggest that such overshoot occurs.”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Lugaro et al. 2003

    Section 5 reports that the predicted ⁹⁶Zr/⁹⁴Zr ratios for 3 M⊙ models are higher than those measured in presolar SiC grains. But Section 4 says the paper’s models produce third dredge-up without extra mixing beyond the convective boundary; it discusses overshoot as a feature of other models. The paper therefore supports the isotopic mismatch, not the claim that overshoot produces it. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 106

  1. 10.1086/322383 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90395-D · DOI
  3. 10.1086/322874 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/342095 · DOI
  5. Amari S., 1995, Meteoritics, 30, 679, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01165.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90477-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X · DOI
  8. Anders E., 1993, Meteoritics, 28, 490, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1993.tb00274.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00030-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/307938 · DOI
  11. 10.1006/adnd.2000.0838 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/170246 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/330728a0 · DOI
  14. Blocker T., 1995, A&A, 297, 727
  15. 10.1086/166323 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1086/173275 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/171918 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/322258 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239 · DOI
  20. 10.1086/175835 · DOI
  21. Cameron A. G. W., 1973, Rev., 15, 121
  22. Clayton, D. D. 1968, Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis (New York: McGraw Hill)
  23. 10.1086/304220 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00701-1 · DOI
  25. Davis A. M., 2001, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 72, 413
  26. Davis, A. M., Nicolussi , G. K., Pellin, M. J., Lewis, R. S. & Clayton, R. N. 1998, in Nuclei in the Cosmos V, ed. N. Prantzos & S. Harissopulos (Paris: Editions Frontieres), 563 · DOI
  27. Davis A. M., 1999, Lunar Planet. Sci., 30, 1976
  28. Denker, A., etal 1995, in Proc. of the Third International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos, ed. M. Busso, R. Gallino, & C. M. Raiteri (New York: AIP), 255
  29. 10.1086/165329 · DOI
  30. 10.1086/173119 · DOI
  31. Frost C. A., 1998, A&A, 332, L17
  32. 10.1086/178152 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/305437 · DOI
  34. Gallino, R., Busso, M. & Lugaro, M. 1997, in Astrophysical Implications of the Laboratory Study of Presolar Materials, ed. T. Bernatowicz & E. Zinner (Woodbury: AIP), 115 · DOI
  35. Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lugaro, M., Travaglio, C. & Straniero, O. 1999, in The Galactic Halo: From Globular Clusters to Field Stars, ed. A. Noels, P. Magain, D. Caro, E. Jehin, G. Parmentier, & A. Thoul (Proc. 35th Liege Int. Astrophys. Colloq.; Liege: Univ. Liege), 81 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/348298a0 · DOI
  37. Gallino R., 1998, Meteoritics Planet. Sci., 33, A54
  38. 10.1016/0375-9474(93)90167-V · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0019-1035(73)90052-3 · DOI
  40. Groenewegen M. A. T., 1995, A&A, 293, 381
  41. Herwig F., 2000, A&A, 360, 952
  42. Herwig F., 1997, A&A, 324, L81
  43. 10.1016/0092-640X(76)90011-5 · DOI
  44. 10.1086/174458 · DOI
  45. Hoppe, P. & Ott, U. 1997, in Astrophysical Implications of the Laboratory Study of Presolar Materials, ed. T. Bernatowicz & E. Zinner (Woodbury: AIP), 27 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0016-7037(95)00435-1 · DOI
  47. 10.1146/annurev.aa.21.090183.001415 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.202501 · DOI
  49. Jennings C. L., 2002, Lunar Planet. Sci., 33, 1833
  50. 10.1088/0034-4885/52/8/002 · DOI
  51. 10.1086/160033 · DOI
  52. 10.1086/175004 · DOI
  53. Kashiv Y., 2001, Lunar Planet. Sci., 32, 2192
  54. Kashiv Y., 2002, Lunar Planet. Sci., 33, 2056
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.R1558 · DOI
  56. 10.1086/191145 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1086/176141 · DOI
  58. Langer N., 1999, A&A, 346, L37
  59. Lattanzio, J. C. & Forestini, M. 1999, in IAU Symp. 191, Proc. of the Symposium on Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, ed. T. Le Bertre, A. Lebre, & C. Waelkens (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 31 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/348293a0 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90478-2 · DOI
  62. Lodders K., 1995, Meteoritics, 30, 661, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1995.tb01164.x · DOI
  63. Lugaro M., 1998, Meteoritics Planet. Sci., 33, A95
  64. 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00698-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1086/308078 · DOI
  66. 10.1063/1.1145546 · DOI
  67. 10.1007/BF00653828 · DOI
  68. Mowlavi N., 1999, A&A, 344, 617
  69. Nichols R. H., Jr., 1992, Lunar Planet. Sci., 23, 989
  70. Nichols R. H., Jr., 1994, Meteoritics, 29, 510
  71. 10.1126/science.277.5330.1281 · DOI
  72. 10.1021/ac960871k · DOI
  73. 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00038-6 · DOI
  74. 10.1086/306072 · DOI
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3583 · DOI
  76. 10.1086/185707 · DOI
  77. Ott U., 1990, Lunar Planet. Sci., 21, 920
  78. Podosek, F. A., Prombo, C. A., Amari, S. & Lewis, R. S. 2003, ApJ, in press
  79. Prombo C. A., 1992, Lunar Planet. Sci., 23, 1111
  80. 10.1086/172756 · DOI
  81. 10.1086/171078 · DOI
  82. 10.1006/adnd.2000.0834 · DOI
  83. Reimers, D. 1975, in Problems in Stellar Atmospheres and Envelopes, ed. B. Baschek, W. H. Kegel, & G. Traving (Berlin: Springer), 229 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Richter S., 1992, Lunar Planet. Sci., 23, 1147
  85. Richter S., 1994, Meteoritics, 29, 522
  86. Richter, S., Ott, U. & Begemann, F. 1994b, in Proc. European Workshop on Heavy Element Nucleosynthesis, ed. E. Somorjai & S. Fulop (Budapest: Inst. Nucl. Res. Hungarian Acad. Sci.), 44
  87. Savina, M. R., Davis, A. M., Tripa, C. E., Pellin, M. J., Clayton, R. N., Lewis R. S. & Amari, S. 2003a, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, in press
  88. Savina, M. R., Pellin, M. J., Tripa, C. E., Veryovkin, I. V., Calaway, W. F. & Davis, A. M. 2003b, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, in press
  89. 10.1086/191421 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/303794 · DOI
  91. 10.1086/187767 · DOI
  92. Straniero O., 2000, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 71, 719
  93. 10.1016/0092-640X(87)90010-6 · DOI
  94. 10.1086/168243 · DOI
  95. 10.1086/307571 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1086/319087 · DOI
  97. 10.1086/152746 · DOI
  98. Vaglio, P., etal 1998, in Nuclei in the Cosmos V, ed. N. Prantzos & S. Harissopulos (Paris: Edition Frontieres), 223
  99. 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1103/PhysRevC.50.2582 · DOI
  101. 10.1086/190373 · DOI
  102. Williamson J. H., 1968, Canadian J. Phys., 46, 1845, 10.1139/p68-523 · DOI
  103. Wood, P. R. 1981, in Physical Processes in Red Giants, ed. I. Iben, Jr. & A. Renzini (Dordrecht: Reidel), 135 · DOI
  104. Zinner, E. 1997, in Astrophysical Implications of the Laboratory Study of Presolar Materials, ed. T. Bernatowicz & E. Zinner (Woodbury, New York: AIP), 3 · DOI
  105. 10.1146/annurev.earth.26.1.147 · DOI · Paper page
  106. 10.1086/186210 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lugaro, M., Davis, A. M., Gallino, R., Pellin, M. J., Straniero, O., & Kappeler, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2003-08-10
Volume
593
Issue
1
Pages
486-508
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2062438474
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (31-109-ENG-38, W - 31 - 109 - Eng - 38)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAG59510)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, strontium isotopes, zirconium isotopes, molybdenum isotopes, barium isotopes, s-process nucleosynthesis, third dredge-up, neutron capture, 13C pocket, thermal pulses, Murchison meteorite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review