The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture in Bonobos? Between‐Species and Within‐Species Variation in Behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Cited by
Hare, B., Wobber, V., & Wrangham, R. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.007 · Cited by 613
Hobaiter, C., Poisot, T., Zuberbühler, K., Hoppitt, W., & Gruber, T. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001960 · Cited by 323
“An ape's view of the Oldowan” revisited
Wynn, T., Hernandez‐Aguilar, R. A., Marchant, L. F., & Mcgrew, W. C. (2011) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20323 · Cited by 186
Male-Mediated Gene Flow in Patrilocal Primates
Schubert, G., Stoneking, C. J., Arandjelovic, M., Boesch, C., Eckhardt, N., Hohmann, G., Langergraber, K., Lukas, D., & Vigilant, L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021514 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B.
- Venue
- Current Anthropology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-571
- ISSN
- 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5382
- OpenAlex
- W2270082738
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture in Bonobos? Between‐Species and Within‐Species Variation in Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377649
- The paper
- Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2003). Culture in Bonobos? Between‐Species and Within‐Species Variation in Behavior. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/377649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
