Cited by 172Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEmployee Performance and Motivation

When Goals Are Counterproductive: The Effects of Violation of a Behavioral Goal on Subsequent Performance

Soman, Dilip, Cheema, Amar·2004·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

A considerable body of research supports the idea that individuals who set behavioral goals perform better than others who set no goals. In this article, we propose that in addition to the positive effects, goals may also have a counterproductive effect. Specifically, we propose that violating one's goal may cause a deterioration of subsequent performance as compared to individuals who have no goals. When the violation of one's goal is coded as a failure, it can result in demotivation, negative emotion, and consequently a poorer performance. We report two experiments that demonstrate the counterproductive effects of goals and discuss potential moderators of this effect along with several possible process explanations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/383423

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research does not consider how highlighting specific patterns of goal-consistent behavior can become motivating in itself and affect consumers' subsequent decisions.

    “Although prior research has explored how progress towards an end goal (or lack thereof) affects subsequent goal-consistent behavior (Cochran and Tesser 1996; Kivetz, Urminsky and Zheng 2006; Soman and Cheema 2004), it does not consider how highlighting specific patterns of goal-consistent behavior can become motivating in itself and affect consumers' subsequent decisions.”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Soman and Cheema 2004

  • Failure is demotivating and reduces the likelihood of future goal-consistent behaviors.

    “Consequently, failure is demotivating and reduces the likelihood of future goal-consistent behaviors (e.g., Soman and Cheema 2004).”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Soman and Cheema 2004

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soman, D., & Cheema, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2004-06
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
52-62
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2085296922
Cited by
172
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
goal setting, behavioral objectives, counterproductive effects, performance degradation, demotivation, negative emotions, failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review