The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Function of Allergy: Immunological Defense Against Toxins
Abstract
This paper proposes that the mammalian immune response known as "allergy" evolved as a last line of defense against the extensive array of toxic substances that exist in the environment in the form of secondary plant compounds and venoms. Whereas nonimmunological defenses typically can target only classes of toxins, the immune system is uniquely capable of the fine-tuning required to target selectively the specific molecular configurations of individual toxins. Toxic substances are commonly allergenic. The pharmacological chemicals released by the body's mast cells during an IgE antibody-mediated allergic response typically cause vomiting diarrhea, coughing, tearing, sneezing, or scratching, which help to expel from the body the toxic substance that triggered the response; individuals frequently develop aversions to substances that have triggered such responses. A strong allergic response often includes a decrease in blood pressure, which slows the rate at which toxins circulate to target organs. The immune system identifies as toxic the following kinds of substances: (1) those low-molecular-weight substances that bind covalently to serum proteins (e.g., many plant toxins); (2) nontoxic proteins that act as carriers of toxins with low molecular weights (e.g., plant proteins associated with plant toxins); (3) specific substances of high molecular weight that harmed individuals in ancestral mammalian populations for a span of time that was significant from the standpoint of nat…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Profet proposed that acute allergic reactions, manifested as immediately occurring symptoms in response to allergen exposure, such as sneezing, coughing, vomiting and diarrhea, evolved as defense mechanisms allowing the sensitized host to respond immediately to, and to expel, neutralize and/or avoid, noxious substances which might be indicative of potentially life-threatening situations [39].”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“This evidence supports the notion [39–41] that key elements of “allergic reactivity”, including mast cells and IgE, indeed can importantly enhance innate and acquired host resistance to venoms.”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“The latter finding supports the idea proposed both by Stebbings [40] and Profet [39] that elements of allergic responses, in this case, mast cells, can confer benefit to hosts experiencing attacks by arthropods [40] or other sources of toxins [39] by altering the host’s behavior in ways that would help to eliminate, or at least permit the host to become aware of, the threat.”
From Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diversity and dialogue in immunity to helminths
Allen, J. E., & Maizels, R. M. (2011) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2992 · Cited by 831
The Intraepithelial T Cell Response to NKG2D-Ligands Links Lymphoid Stress Surveillance to Atopy
Strid, J., Sobolev, O., Zafirova, B., Polic, B., & Hayday, A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211250 · Cited by 155
Mast cells and IgE in defense against venoms: Possible “good side” of allergy?
Galli, S. J., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2016) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2015.09.002 · Cited by 73
Mast cells and IgE in defense against lethality of venoms: Possible “benefit” of allergy
Galli, S. J., Metz, M., Starkl, P., Marichal, T., & Tsai, M. (2020) · Allergo Journal International · doi:10.1007/s40629-020-00118-6 · Cited by 57
Understanding the Type 2 Immunity: An Evolving View Beyond Allergic Diseases
Jiménez‐Saiz, R., Iborra, S., Blanco, C., González‐Pérez, R., Nuñez‐Borque, E., Zeyneloglu, C., Babayev, H., Göksel, O., Göksel, T., Khaitov, M., et al. (2026) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.70512 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Profet, M.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-62
- ISSN
- 0033-5770
- 1539-7718
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review