The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Chandra Deep Field–South: Optical Spectroscopy. I.
Open accessAbstract
We present the results of our spectroscopic follow-up program of the X-ray sources detected in the 942 ks exposure of the Chandra Deep Field-South (CDFS). A total of 288 possible counterparts were observed at the VLT with the FORS1/FORS2 spectrographs for 251 of the 349 Chandra sources (including three additional faint X-ray sources). Spectra and R -band images are shown for all the observed sources and R - K colors are given for most of them. Spectroscopic redshifts were obtained for 168 X-ray sources, of which 137 have both reliable optical identification and redshift estimate (including 16 external identifications). The R < 24 observed sample comprises 161 X-ray objects (181 optical counterparts), and 126 of them have unambiguous spectroscopic identification. There are two spikes in the redshift distribution, predominantly populated by type 2 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) but also type 1 AGN and X-ray normal galaxies: the one at z = 0.734 is fairly narrow (in redshift space) and comprises two clusters/groups of galaxies centered on extended X-ray sources, the second one at z = 0.674 is broader and should trace a sheetlike structure. The type 1 and type 2 populations are clearly separated in X-ray/optical diagnostics involving parameters sensitive to absorption/reddening: X-ray hardness ratio (HR), optical/near-IR color, soft X-ray flux, and optical brightness. Nevertheless, these two populations cover similar ranges of hard X-ray luminosity and absolute K magnitude, thus trace similar levels of gravitational accretion. Consequently, we introduce a new classification based solely on X-ray properties, HR, and X-ray luminosity, consistent with the unified AGN model. This X-ray classification uncovers a large fraction of optically obscured, X-ray-luminous AGNs missed by the classical optical classification. We find a similar number of X-ray type 1 and type 2 QSOs [ L X (0.5-10 keV) > 10 44 ergs s -1 ] at z > 2 (13 sources with unambiguous spectroscopic identification); most X-ray type 1 QSOs are bright, R ≲ 24, whereas most X-ray type 2 QSOs have R ≳ 24, which may explain the difference with the CDFN results as few spectroscopic redshifts were obtained for R > 24 CDFN X-ray counterparts. There are X-ray type 1 QSOs down to z ~ 0.5, but a strong decrease at z < 2 in the fraction of luminous X-ray type 2 QSOs may indicate a cosmic evolution of the X-ray luminosity function of the type 2 population. An X-ray spectral analysis is required to confirm this possible evolution. The red color of most X-ray type 2 AGNs could be due to dust associated with the X-ray absorbing material and/or a substantial contribution of the host galaxy light. The latter can also be important for some redder X-ray type 1 AGNs. There is a large population of EROs ( R - K > 5) as X-ray counterparts, and their fraction strongly increases with decreasing optical flux, up to 25% for the R ≥ 24 sample. They cover the whole range of X-ray hardness ratios, comprise objects of various classes (in particular a high fraction of z ≳ 1 X-ray absorbed AGNs, but also elliptical and starburst galaxies) and more than half of them should be fairly bright X-ray sources [ L X (0.5-10 keV) > 10 42 ergs s -1 ]. Photometric redshifts will be necessary to derive the properties and evolution of the X-ray selected EROs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. (1989) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/167900 · Cited by 11,795
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei
Osterbrock, D. E., & Michael Shull, J. (1989) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811187 · Cited by 3,699
A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., et al. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312840 · Cited by 3,671
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts
Colless, M., Dalton, G., Maddox, S., Sutherland, W., Norberg, P., Cole, S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Collins, C., et al. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04902.x · Cited by 2,367
A Relationship Between Nuclear Black Hole Mass And Galaxy Velocity Dispersion
Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C. J., Ho, L. C., Kormendy, J., et al. (2000) · Cited by 2,108
The Relation between Black Hole Mass, Bulge Mass, and Near-Infrared Luminosity
Marconi, A., & Hunt, L. K. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375804 · Cited by 1,708
Cited by
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/499298 · Cited by 1,873
Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., Labbé, I., Franx, M., van der Wel, A., Bezanson, R., Da Cunha, E., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/24 · Cited by 983
The synthesis of the cosmic X-ray background in the Chandra and XMM-Newton era
Gilli, R., Comastri, A., & Hasinger, G. (2007) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066334 · Cited by 908
Self-citationPolletta, M., Tajer, M., Maraschi, L., Trinchieri, G., Lonsdale, C. J., Chiappetti, L., Andreon, S., Pierre, M., Le Fevre, O., Zamorani, G., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/518113 · Cited by 869
Passively Evolving Early‐Type Galaxies at 1.4 ≲z≲ 2.5 in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field
Daddi, E., Renzini, A., Pirzkal, N., Cimatti, A., Malhotra, S., Stiavelli, M., Xu, C., Pasquali, A., Rhoads, J. E., Brusa, M., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/430104 · Cited by 866
Metadata
- Authors
- Szokoly, G. P., Bergeron, J., Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., Kewley, L., Mainieri, V., Nonino, M., Rosati, P., Giacconi, R., Gilli, R., Gilmozzi, R., Norman, C., Romaniello, M., Schreier, E., Tozzi, P., Wang, J. X., Zheng, W., & Zirm, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-349
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2151796687
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 30.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Chandra Deep Field–South: Optical Spectroscopy. I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/424707
- The paper
- Szokoly, G. P., Bergeron, J., Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., Kewley, L., Mainieri, V., Nonino, M., Rosati, P., Giacconi, R., Gilli, R., Gilmozzi, R., Norman, C., Romaniello, M., Schreier, E., Tozzi, P., Wang, J. X., Zheng, W., & Zirm, A. (2004). The Chandra Deep Field–South: Optical Spectroscopy. I. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/424707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.