The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction
Abstract
In the first section of this article, a model of good strategy use is reviewed. Good strategy users know many strategies and much information about when and where to use them. They are reflective and have low anxiety. They possess beliefs about themselves and performance that are compatible with good strategy use (e. g., that they can do well by using the right approaches). These beliefs motivate use of strategies. Good strategy users can combine strategies proficiently and often execute strategic sequences automatically. Good strategy use is complex and thus calls for prolonged and detailed instruction. The second part of the article reviews the enormous challenges involved in teaching strategies. For instance, there are many strategies. They are best acquired when classroom teaching is interactive, with teacher-provided, responsive feedback. Many students are committed to ineffective strategies, largely because people are not proficient at strategy monitoring. Moreover, there is not enough professional evaluation of techniques that are recommended in the literature, with many strategies oversold by proponents. More positively, researchers are identifying strategies that can be taught profitably, when strategy instruction is beneficial, and how to do it more effectively. The third section of the article provides suggestions for teachers who want to begin teaching strategies in their classrooms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Test anxiety and direction of attention
Wine, J. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031332 · Cited by 1,055
Some determinants and consequences of the teacher's perception of causation.
Johnson, T. J., Feigenbaum, R., & Weiby, M. (1964) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0043389 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Dual coding theory and education
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320076 · Cited by 2,108
Question Asking During Tutoring
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312031001104 · Cited by 900
Inherent details in self-regulated learning.
Winne, P. H. (1995) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2 · Cited by 729
The Development of Expertise: The Journey From Acclimation to Proficiency
Alexander, P. A. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032008010 · Cited by 700
Metadata
- Authors
- Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D.
- Venue
- The Elementary School Journal
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-342
- ISSN
- 0013-5984 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2015416110
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/461578
- The paper
- Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction. The Elementary School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/461578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.