The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Dry is the Brown Dwarf Desert? Quantifying the Relative Number of Planets, Brown Dwarfs, and Stellar Companions around Nearby Sun‐like Stars
Open accessAbstract
Sun-like stars have stellar, brown dwarf, and planetary companions. To help constrain their formation and migration scenarios, we analyze the close companions (orbital period <5 yr) of nearby Sun-like stars. By using the same sample to extract the relative numbers of stellar, brown dwarf, and planetary companions, we verify the existence of a very dry brown dwarf desert and describe it quantitatively. With decreasing mass, the companion mass function drops by almost 2 orders of magnitude from 1 M ☉ stellar companions to the brown dwarf desert and then rises by more than an order of magnitude from brown dwarfs to Jupiter-mass planets. The slopes of the planetary and stellar companion mass functions are of opposite sign and are incompatible at the 3 σ level, thus yielding a brown dwarf desert. The minimum number of companions per unit interval in log mass (the driest part of the desert) is at M = 31 M J . Approximately 16% of Sun-like stars have close ( P < 5 yr) companions more massive than Jupiter: 11% ± 3% are stellar, <1% are brown dwarf, and 5% ± 2% are giant planets. The steep decline in the number of companions in the brown dwarf regime, compared to the initial mass function of individual stars and free-floating brown dwarfs, suggests either a different spectrum of gravitational fragmentation in the formation environment or post-formation migratory processes disinclined to leave brown dwarfs in close orbits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems
Winn, J. N., & Fabrycky, D. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122246 · Cited by 891
Dearth of short-period Neptunian exoplanets: A desert in period-mass and period-radius planes
Mazeh, T., Holczer, T., & Faigler, S. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201528065 · Cited by 355
MAPPING THE SHORES OF THE BROWN DWARF DESERT. II. MULTIPLE STAR FORMATION IN TAURUS-AURIGA
Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Martinache, F., & Hillenbrand, L. A. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/8 · Cited by 325
Mapping the Shores of the Brown Dwarf Desert. I. Upper Scorpius
Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Martinache, F., & Lloyd, J. P. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/587435 · Cited by 207
Statistical properties of brown dwarf companions: implications for different formation mechanisms
Ma, B., & Ge, J. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu134 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Grether, D., & Lineweaver, C. H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 640
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1051-1062
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2167589842
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Dry is the Brown Dwarf Desert? Quantifying the Relative Number of Planets, Brown Dwarfs, and Stellar Companions around Nearby Sun‐like Stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/500161
- The paper
- Grether, D., & Lineweaver, C. H. (2006). How Dry is the Brown Dwarf Desert? Quantifying the Relative Number of Planets, Brown Dwarfs, and Stellar Companions around Nearby Sun‐like Stars. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/500161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.