Cited by 125Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHistorical Medical Research and TreatmentsVector-borne infectious diseases

Doxycycline compared with benzathine penicillin for the treatment of early syphilis.

Ghanem, K. G., Erbelding, E. J., Cheng, W. W., Rompalo, A. M.·2006·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Doxycycline is the preferred recommended second-line agent for the treatment of syphilis, although efficacy data from controlled trials are lacking. We compared the serological responses of patients with early syphilis treated with doxycycline with the responses of patients treated with benzathine penicillin G (BPG). METHODS: All patients who received a diagnosis of early syphilis attending 2 public sexually transmitted disease clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, who were treated with doxycycline (100 mg orally, twice daily for 14 days) between October 1993 and June 2000 were eligible. Patients treated with BPG (a single dose of 2.4 million units intramuscularly) were selected as the control group. Inclusion criteria included a clinician-recorded diagnosis of primary, secondary, or early latent syphilis with reactive serological test results at the time of diagnosis and at least 1 follow-up serological test titer. Serological failure was defined as lack of a 4-fold drop in rapid plasma reagin titer 270-400 days after treatment, or a 4-fold increase in titer 30-400 days after therapy. RESULTS: During the study period, 1558 patients were treated for early syphilis, and 87 received doxycycline. Of those treated with doxycycline, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three patients from a randomly selected group of 200 age-matched individuals treated with BPG met the inclusion criteria. There were 4 patients with serological failure in the BPG group (5.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6%-13.8%) and 0 patients with serological failure in the doxycycline group (0%; 95% CI, 0%-10.3%; P=.2). The median times to successful serological responses for patients in the doxycycline and BPG groups were 106 days (95% CI, 75-149 days) and 137 days (95% CI, 111-172 days), respectively (P=.6). CONCLUSION: Doxycycline appears to be an effective agent for the treatment of early syphilis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/500406

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doxycycline 100 mg once or twice daily for 14 days is effective for syphilis.

    “although 100 mg once (OD) or twice daily (BD) for 14 days is effective,92–96”

    From BASHH UK guidelines for the management of syphilis 2024 (2024) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Methods and Results report treatment of early syphilis with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days, with no serological failures among 34 eligible patients. The paper does not establish the effectiveness of 100 mg once daily for exactly 14 days; it describes a separate uncontrolled study using once-daily dosing for 10–15 days. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Doxycycline (100 mg orally 2 times/day for 14 days) can be effective for nonpregnant persons with penicillin allergy who have primary or secondary syphilis.

    “Doxycycline (100 mg orally 2 times/day for 14 days) (600,601) and tetracycline (500 mg orally 4 times/day for 14 days) have been used for years and can be effective.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [600]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rajam RV, Rangiah RN, Somini C, Krishnamoorthy C. Tetracycline (achromycin) in venereal diseases. Antiseptic Madras 1956; 53:9-19.
  2. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete ob- servations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 3:457-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghanem, K. G., Erbelding, E. J., Cheng, W. W., & Rompalo, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ghanem, K. G.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2006-03-15
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
e45-e49
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2150139804
Cited by
125
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI045724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
early syphilis, doxycycline, benzathine penicillin G, syphilis treatment, serological response, RPR titer, second-line therapy, sexually transmitted infections
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Doxycycline, Drug Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Penicillin G Benzathine, Retrospective Studies, Syphilis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review