Cited by 248Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort

Nunes, Joseph C., Drèze, Xavier·2006·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

This research documents a phenomenon we call the endowed progress effect, whereby people provided with artificial advancement toward a goal exhibit greater persistence toward reaching the goal. By converting a task requiring eight steps into a task requiring 10 steps but with two steps already complete, the task is reframed as one that has been undertaken and incomplete rather than not yet begun. This increases the likelihood of task completion and decreases completion time. The effect appears to depend on perceptions of task completion rather than a desire to avoid wasting the endowed progress. Moderators include the reason, if any, offered for the endowment and the currency in which progress is recorded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/500480

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
2006-03
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
504-512
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W3124406192
Cited by
248
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
task persistence, task completion, perceived progress, effort, goal progress, task completion time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review