The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What’s In and What’s Out: Questions on the Boundaries of the Attitude Construct
Open accessAbstract
While reasonably comprehensive in nature, Cohen and Reed's integrative attitude model may benefit from an articulation of the boundaries of the attitude construct. As evidence, the present comment focuses on the extent to which attitudes can or should account for hot affect-based brand relationships and stronger forms of behaviors consumers reveal with brands. The authors recommend that the boundary conditions of the attitude construct can be elucidated by differentiating attitudes from a construct termed “emotional attachment.” Potential differences between these two constructs are articulated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713
Self-citationMikulincer, M., Hirschberger, G., Nachmias, O., & Gillath, O. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.305 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Customer Experience Management in Retailing: An Organizing Framework
Grewal, D., Levy, M., & Kumar, V. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2009.01.001 · Cited by 1,014
Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process
Puccinelli, N. M., Goodstein, R. C., Grewal, D., Price, R., Raghubir, P., & Stewart, D. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.003 · Cited by 960
Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis
de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Pinto, D. C., Herter, M. M., Sampaio, C. H., & Babin, B. J. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00731-5 · Cited by 523
Experience Marketing: Concepts, Frameworks and Consumer Insights
Schmitt, B. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000027 · Cited by 428
Fedorikhin, A., Park, C. W., & Thomson, M. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.006 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. W., & MacInnis, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-18
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2168652818
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What’s In and What’s Out: Questions on the Boundaries of the Attitude Construct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/504122
- The paper
- Park, C. W., & MacInnis, D. J. (2006). What’s In and What’s Out: Questions on the Boundaries of the Attitude Construct. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/504122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
