The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making a Short Gamma-Ray Burst from a Long One: Implications for the Nature of GRB 060614
Open accessAbstract
The absence of a supernova accompanying the nearby long GRB 060614 poses a great puzzle about the progenitor of this event and challenges the current GRB classification scheme. This burst displays a short-hard emission episode followed by extended soft emission with strong spectral evolution. Noticing that this burst has an isotropic gamma-ray energy only ~8 times that of GRB 050724, a good candidate of merger-type short GRBs, we generate a "pseudo"burst that is ~8 times less energetic than GRB 060614 based on the spectral properties of GRB 060614 and the E p ∝ E (Amati) relation. We find that this pseudoburst would have been detected by BATSE as a marginal short-duration GRB and would have properties in the Swift BAT and XRT bands similar to GRB 050724. This suggests that GRB 060614 is likely a more intense event in the traditional short-hard GRB category. Events like GRB 060614 that seem to defy the traditional short versus long classification of GRBs may require modification of our classification terminology for GRBs. By analogy with supernova classifications, we suggest that GRBs be classified into Type I (typically short and associated with old populations) and Type II (typically long and associated with young populations). We propose that GRB 060614 belongs to Type I and predict that similar events will be detected in elliptical galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
Self-citation
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationFong, W., Berger, E., Margutti, R., & Zauderer, B. A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/102 · Cited by 532
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Pozanenko, A., Wilson, A. C., Butler, N. R., Jakobsson, P., Schulze, S., et al. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1513 · Cited by 363
Self-citationLiang, E., Zhang, B., Virgili, F., & Dai, Z. G. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/517959 · Cited by 314
Self-citationTHE AFTERGLOWS OF SWIFT-ERA GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. II. TYPE I GRB VERSUS TYPE II GRB OPTICAL AFTERGLOWS
Kann, D. A., Klose, S., Zhang, B., Covino, S., Butler, N. R., Malesani, D., Nakar, E., Wilson, A. C., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/2/96 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., Zhang, B.-B., Liang, E.-W., Gehrels, N., Burrows, D. N., & Mészáros, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-01-04
- Volume
- 655
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L25-L28
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1972334617
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.