Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Stellar and Planetary Parameters of Transiting Planet Systems: The Case of TrES‐2

Open access
Sozzetti, Alessandro, Torres, Guillermo, Charbonneau, David, Latham, David W., Holman, Matthew J., Winn, Joshua N., Laird, John B., O’Donovan, Francis T.·2007·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report on a spectroscopic determination of the atmospheric parameters and chemical abundance of the parent star of the recently discovered transiting planet TrES-2. A detailed LTE analysis of a set of Fe I and Fe II lines from our Keck spectra yields T eff = 5850 ± 50 K, log g = 4.4 ± 0.1, and [Fe/H] = -0.15 ± 0.10. Several independent checks (e.g., additional spectroscopy, line-depth ratios) confirm the reliability of our spectroscopic T eff estimate. The mass and radius of the star, needed to determine the properties of the planet, are traditionally inferred by comparison with stellar evolution models using T eff and some measure of the stellar luminosity, such as the spectroscopic surface gravity. We apply here a new method in which we use instead of log g the normalized separation a / R ⋆ (related to the stellar density), directly measurabele from the light curves of transiting planets with much greater precision. With the a / R ⋆ value from the light-curve analysis of Holman and coworkers and our T eff estimate, we obtain M ⋆ = 0.980 ± 0.062 M ☉ and R ⋆ = 1.000 R ☉ , and an evolutionary age of 5.1 Gyr, in good agreement with other constraints (Ca II H and K line cores, lithium abundance, and rotation). The new stellar parameters yield improved values for the planetary mass and radius of M p = 1.198 ± 0.053 M J and R p = 1.220 R J , confirming that TrES-2 is the most massive among the currently known nearby ( d ≲ 300 pc) transiting hot Jupiters. The surface gravity of the planet, log g p = 3.299 ± 0.016, can be derived independently of the knowledge of the stellar parameters (i.e., directly from observations), and with a very high precision rivaling that of the best known double-lined eclipsing binaries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/519214

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Sozzetti, A., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Latham, D. W., Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Laird, J. B., & O’Donovan, F. T.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2007-08
Volume
664
Issue
2
Pages
1190-1198
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2086348127
Cited by
317
References
90
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Stellar and Planetary Parameters of Transiting Planet Systems: The Case of TrES‐2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/519214
The paper
Sozzetti, A., Torres, G., Charbonneau, D., Latham, D. W., Holman, M. J., Winn, J. N., Laird, J. B., & O’Donovan, F. T. (2007). Improving Stellar and Planetary Parameters of Transiting Planet Systems: The Case of TrES‐2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/519214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.