The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mass‐Radius Relationships for Solid Exoplanets
Open accessAbstract
We use new interior models of cold planets to investigate the mass-radius relationships of solid exoplanets, considering planets made primarily of iron, silicates, water, and carbon compounds. We find that the mass-radius relationships for cold terrestrial mass planets of all compositions we considered follow a generic functional form that is not a simple power law: log 10 R s = k 1 + log 10 ( M s ) - k 2 M for up to M p ≈ 20 M ⊕ , where M s and R s are scaled mass and radius values. This functional form arises because the common building blocks of solid planets all have equations of state that are well approximated by a modified polytrope of the form ρ = ρ 0 + cP n . We find that highly detailed planet interior models, including temperature structure and phase changes, are not necessary to derive solid exoplanet bulk composition from mass and radius measurements. For solid exoplanets with no substantial atmosphere we have also found the following: with 5% fractional uncertainty in planet mass and radius it is possible to distinguish among planets composed predominantly of iron or silicates or water ice but not more detailed compositions; with ~5% uncertainty water ice planets with ≳25% water by mass may be identified; the minimum plausible planet size for a given mass is that of a pure iron planet; and carbon planet mass-radius relationships overlap with those of silicate and water planets due to similar zero-pressure densities and equations of state. We propose a definition of "super-Earths" based on the clear distinction in radii between planets with significant gas envelopes and those without.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Bryson, S. T., Jenkins, J. M., Rowe, J. F., Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Dunham, E. W., Gautier, T. N., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/2/15 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationA super-Earth transiting a nearby low-mass star
Charbonneau, D., Berta, Z. K., Irwin, J., Burke, C. J., Nutzman, P., Buchhave, L. A., Lovis, C., Bonfils, X., Latham, D. W., Udry, S., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08679 · Cited by 797
THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII
Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l6 · Cited by 665
KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b
Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., Buchhave, L. A., Caldwell, D. A., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Ciardi, D., Dunham, E. W., Fressin, F., Gautier, T. N., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/1/27 · Cited by 531
Self-citationMASS–RADIUS RELATION FOR ROCKY PLANETS BASED ON PREM
Zeng, L., Sasselov, D. D., & Jacobsen, S. B. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/2/127 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier‐Majumder, C. A., & Militzer, B.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2007-11-10
- Volume
- 669
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1279-1297
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2049747765
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass‐Radius Relationships for Solid Exoplanets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/521346
- The paper
- Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier‐Majumder, C. A., & Militzer, B. (2007). Mass‐Radius Relationships for Solid Exoplanets. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/521346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.