Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS. I. Stellar Number Density Distribution

Open access
Jurić, Mario, Ivezić, Željko, Brooks, Alyson, Lupton, Robert H., Schlegel, David, Finkbeiner, Douglas, Padmanabhan, Nikhil, Bond, Nicholas, Sesar, Branimir, Rockosi, Constance M., Knapp, Gillian R., Gunn, James E., Sumi, Takahiro, Schneider, Donald P., Barentine, J. C., Brewington, Howard J., Brinkmann, J., Fukugita, Masataka, Harvanek, Michael, Kleinman, S. J., Krzesinski, Jurek, Long, Dan, Neilsen, Jr., Eric H., Nitta, Atsuko, Snedden, Stephanie A., York, Donald G.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Using the photometric parallax method we estimate the distances to ~48 million stars detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and map their three-dimensional number density distribution in the Galaxy. The currently available data sample the distance range from 100 pc to 20 kpc and cover 6500 deg 2 of sky, mostly at high Galactic latitudes (|b| > 25). These stellar number density maps allow an investigation of the Galactic structure with no a priori assumptions about the functional form of its components. The data show strong evidence for a Galaxy consisting of an oblate halo, a disk component, and a number of localized overdensities. The number density distribution of stars as traced by M dwarfs in the solar neighborhood ( D < 2 kpc) is well fit by two exponential disks (the thin and thick disk) with scale heights and lengths, bias corrected for an assumed 35% binary fraction, of H 1 = 300 pc and L 1 = 2600 pc, and H 2 = 900 pc and L 2 = 3600 pc, and local thick-to-thin disk density normalization ρ thick ( R ☉ )/ρ thin ( R ☉ ) = 12% . We use the stars near main-sequence turnoff to measure the shape of the Galactic halo. We find a strong preference for oblate halo models, with best-fit axis ratio c / a = 0.64, ρ H ∝ r −2.8 power-law profile, and the local halo-to-thin disk normalization of 0.5%. Based on a series of Monte Carlo simulations, we estimate the errors of derived model parameters not to be larger than ~20% for the disk scales and ~10% for the density normalization, with largest contributions to error coming from the uncertainty in calibration of the photometric parallax relation and poorly constrained binary fraction. While generally consistent with the above model, the measured density distribution shows a number of statistically significant localized deviations. In addition to known features, such as the Monoceros stream, we detect two overdensities in the thick disk region at cylindrical galactocentric radii and heights ( R,Z ) ∼ (6.5,1.5) kpc and ( R,Z ) ∼ (9.5,0.8) kpc and a remarkable density enhancement in the halo covering over 1000 deg 2 of sky toward the constellation of Virgo, at distances of ~6-20 kpc. Compared to counts in a region symmetric with respect to the l = 0° line and with the same Galactic latitude, the Virgo overdensity is responsible for a factor of 2 number density excess and may be a nearby tidal stream or a low-surface brightness dwarf galaxy merging with the Milky Way. The u − g color distribution of stars associated with it implies metallicity lower than that of thick disk stars and consistent with the halo metallicity distribution. After removal of the resolved overdensities, the remaining data are consistent with a smooth density distribution; we detect no evidence of further unresolved clumpy substructure at scales ranging from ~50 pc in the disk to ~1-2 kpc in the halo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/523619

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Cited by

See all 1,312

Metadata

Authors
Jurić, M., Ivezić, Ž., Brooks, A., Lupton, R. H., Schlegel, D., Finkbeiner, D., Padmanabhan, N., Bond, N., Sesar, B., Rockosi, C. M., Knapp, G. R., Gunn, J. E., Sumi, T., Schneider, D. P., Barentine, J. C., Brewington, H. J., Brinkmann, J., Fukugita, M., Harvanek, M., Kleinman, S. J., Krzesinski, J., Long, D., Neilsen, Jr., Nitta, A., Snedden, S. A., & York, D. G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-02
Volume
673
Issue
2
Pages
864-914
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2011490256
Cited by
1,312
References
111
FWCI
48.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS. I. Stellar Number Density Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/523619
The paper
Jurić, M., Ivezić, Ž., Brooks, A., Lupton, R. H., Schlegel, D., Finkbeiner, D., Padmanabhan, N., Bond, N., Sesar, B., Rockosi, C. M., Knapp, G. R., Gunn, J. E., Sumi, T., Schneider, D. P., Barentine, J. C., Brewington, H. J., Brinkmann, J., Fukugita, M., Harvanek, M., . . . York, D. G. (2008). The Milky Way Tomography with SDSS. I. Stellar Number Density Distribution. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/523619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.