Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metallicity Calibrations and the Mass‐Metallicity Relation for Star‐forming Galaxies

Open access
Kewley, Lisa J., Ellison, Sara L.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We investigate the effect of metallicity calibrations, AGN classification, and aperture covering fraction on the local mass-metallicity ( M - Z ) relation using 27,730 star-forming galaxies from the SDSS Data Release 4. We analyze the SDSS M - Z relation with 10 metallicity calibrations, including theoretical and empirical methods. We show that the choice of metallicity calibration has a significant effect on the shape and y -intercept [12 + log (O/H) ] of the M - Z relation. The absolute metallicity scale ( y -intercept) varies up to Δ [ log (O/H) ] = 0.7 dex, depending on the calibration used, and the change in shape is substantial. These results indicate that it is critical to use the same metallicity calibration when comparing different luminosity-metallicity or M - Z relations. We present new metallicity conversions that allow metallicities that have been derived using different strong-line calibrations to be converted to the same base calibration. These conversions facilitate comparisons between different samples, particularly comparisons between galaxies at different redshifts for which different suites of emission lines are available. Our new conversions successfully remove the large 0.7 dex discrepancies between the metallicity calibrations, and we reach agreement in the M - Z relation to within 0.03 dex on average. We investigate the effect of AGN classification and aperture covering fraction on the M - Z relation. We find that different AGN classification methods have negligible effect on the SDSS M - Z relation. We compare the SDSS M - Z relation with nuclear and global relations from the NFGS. The turnover of the M - Z relation at M * ∼ 10 10 M ☉ depends on the aperture covering fraction. We find that a lower redshift limit of z < 0.04 is insufficient for avoiding aperture effects in fiber spectra of the highest stellar mass ( M * > 10 10 M ☉ ) galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/587500

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,470

Metadata

Authors
Kewley, L. J., & Ellison, S. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-07-10
Volume
681
Issue
2
Pages
1183-1204
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2096147217
Cited by
1,470
References
2
FWCI
34.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metallicity Calibrations and the Mass‐Metallicity Relation for Star‐forming Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/587500
The paper
Kewley, L. J., & Ellison, S. L. (2008). Metallicity Calibrations and the Mass‐Metallicity Relation for Star‐forming Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/587500

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.