Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An X‐Ray, Infrared, and Submillimeter Flare of Sagittarius A*

Open access
Marrone, D. P., Baganoff, F. K., Morris, M. R., Moran, J. M., Ghez, A. M., Hornstein, S. D., Dowell, C. D., Muñoz, D. J., Bautz, M. W., Ricker, G. R., Brandt, W. N., Garmire, G. P., Lu, J. R., Matthews, K., Zhao, J.‐H., Rao, R., Bower, G. C.·2008·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Energetic flares are observed in the Galactic supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* from radio to X-ray wavelengths. On a few occasions, simultaneous flares have been detected in IR and X-ray observations, but clear counterparts at longer wavelengths have not been seen. We present a flare observed over several hours on 2006 July 17 with the Chandra X-Ray Observatory , the Keck II telescope, the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, and the Submillimeter Array. All telescopes observed strong flare events, but the submillimeter peak is found to occur nearly 100 minutes after the X-ray peak. Submillimeter polarization data show linear polarization in the excess flare emission, increasing from 9% to 17% as the flare passes through its peak, consistent with a transition from optically thick to thin synchrotron emission. The temporal and spectral behavior of the flare require that the energetic electrons responsible for the emission cool faster than expected from their radiative output. This is consistent with adiabatic cooling in an expanding emission region, with X-rays produced through self-Compton scattering, although not consistent with the simplest model of such expansion. We also present a submillimeter flare that followed a bright IR flare on 2005 July 31. Compared to 2006, this event had a larger peak IR flux and similar submillimeter flux, but it lacked measurable X-ray emission. It also showed a shorter delay between the IR and submillimeter peaks. Based on these events we propose a synchrotron and self-Compton model to relate the submillimeter lag and the variable IR/X-ray luminosity ratio.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/588806

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Marrone, D. P., Baganoff, F. K., Morris, M. R., Moran, J. M., Ghez, A. M., Hornstein, S. D., Dowell, C. D., Muñoz, D. J., Bautz, M. W., Ricker, G. R., Brandt, W. N., Garmire, G. P., Lu, J. R., Matthews, K., Zhao, J. ‐., Rao, R., & Bower, G. C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2008-07-20
Volume
682
Issue
1
Pages
373-383
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2133983488
Cited by
218
References
3
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An X‐Ray, Infrared, and Submillimeter Flare of Sagittarius A*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/588806
The paper
Marrone, D. P., Baganoff, F. K., Morris, M. R., Moran, J. M., Ghez, A. M., Hornstein, S. D., Dowell, C. D., Muñoz, D. J., Bautz, M. W., Ricker, G. R., Brandt, W. N., Garmire, G. P., Lu, J. R., Matthews, K., Zhao, J. ‐., Rao, R., & Bower, G. C. (2008). An X‐Ray, Infrared, and Submillimeter Flare of Sagittarius A*. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/588806

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.