Cited by 214Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

1.3 mm WAVELENGTH VLBI OF SAGITTARIUS A*: DETECTION OF TIME-VARIABLE EMISSION ON EVENT HORIZON SCALES

Open access
Fish, Vincent L., Doeleman, Sheperd S., Beaudoin, Christopher, Blundell, Ray, Bolin, David E., Bower, Geoffrey C., Chamberlin, Richard, Freund, Robert +22 more·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Sagittarius A*, the ∼4 × 10 6 M ☉ black hole candidate at the Galactic center, can be studied on Schwarzschild radius scales with (sub)millimeter wavelength very long baseline interferometry (VLBI). We report on 1.3 mm wavelength observations of Sgr A* using a VLBI array consisting of the JCMT on Mauna Kea, the Arizona Radio Observatory's Submillimeter Telescope on Mt. Graham in Arizona, and two telescopes of the CARMA array at Cedar Flat in California. Both Sgr A* and the quasar calibrator 1924−292 were observed over three consecutive nights, and both sources were clearly detected on all baselines. For the first time, we are able to extract 1.3 mm VLBI interferometer phase information on Sgr A* through measurement of closure phase on the triangle of baselines. On the third night of observing, the correlated flux density of Sgr A* on all VLBI baselines increased relative to the first two nights, providing strong evidence for time-variable change on scales of a few Schwarzschild radii. These results suggest that future VLBI observations with greater sensitivity and additional baselines will play a valuable role in determining the structure of emission near the event horizon of Sgr A*.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/l36

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Broderick, A. E., Fish, V. L., Doeleman, S. S., & Loeb, A. 2010, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:1011.2770) · arXiv
  2. Ghez, A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1044 · DOI
  3. Markoff, S., Bower, G. C., & Falcke, H. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1519 · DOI
  4. Marrone, D. P., Moran, J. M., Zhao, J.-H., & Rao, R. 2006, ApJ, 640, 308 · DOI
  5. Marrone, D. P., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 373 · DOI
  6. Shcherbakov, R. V., Penna, R. F., & McKinney, J. C. 2010, ApJ, submitted (arXiv:1007.4832) · arXiv
  7. Yuan, F., Quataert, E., & Narayan, R. 2003, ApJ, 598, 301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fish, V. L., Doeleman, S. S., Beaudoin, C., Blundell, R., Bolin, D. E., Bower, G. C., Chamberlin, R., Freund, R., Friberg, P., Gurwell, M. A., Honma, M., Inoue, M., Krichbaum, T. P., Lamb, J., Marrone, D. P., Moran, J. M., Oyama, T., Plambeck, R., Primiani, R., Rogers, A. E. E., Smythe, D. L., SooHoo, J., Strittmatter, P., Tilanus, R. P. J., Titus, M., Weintroub, J., Wright, M., Woody, D., Young, K. H., & Ziurys, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (US)
  • National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (JP)
  • Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica (TW)
  • Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (DE)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Dutch Research Council (NL)
Corresponding author
Fish, Vincent L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
727
Issue
2
Pages
L36
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2117092829
Cited by
214
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21244019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic Center black hole, submillimeter interferometry, closure phases, Schwarzschild radius, black hole accretion, James Clerk Maxwell Telescope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review