Cited by 131Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

MILLIMETER FLARES AND VLBI VISIBILITIES FROM RELATIVISTIC SIMULATIONS OF MAGNETIZED ACCRETION ONTO THE GALACTIC CENTER BLACK HOLE

Open access
Dexter, Jason, Agol, Eric, Fragile, P. Chris·2009·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The recent very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observation of the Galactic center black hole candidate Sgr A* at 1.3 mm shows source structure on event-horizon scales. This detection enables a direct comparison of the emission region with models of the accretion flow onto the black hole. We present the first results from time-dependent radiative transfer of general relativistic MHD simulation data, and compare simulated synchrotron images at black hole spin a = 0.9 with the VLBI measurements. After tuning the accretion rate to match the millimeter flux, we find excellent agreement between predicted and observed visibilities, even when viewed face-on ( i ≲ 30°). VLBI measurements on 2000–3000 km baselines should constrain the inclination. The data constrain the accretion rate to be (1.0–2.3) × 10 −9 M ☉ yr −1 with 99% confidence, consistent with but independent of prior estimates derived from spectroscopic and polarimetric measurements. Finally, we compute light curves, which show that magnetic turbulence can directly produce flaring events with 0.5 hr rise times, 2–3.5 hr durations, and 40%–50% flux modulation, in agreement with observations of Sgr A* at millimeter wavelengths.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/703/2/l142

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More sophisticated numerical simulations employing GRMHD also agree on the estimated accretion rates from the simpler accretion flow models.

    “More sophisticated numerical simulations employing state-of-the-art methods for solving the General Relativistic Magneto-Hydrodynamics (GRMHD) equations also agree on the estimated accretion rates from the simpler accretion flow models (Dexter et al. 2009; Drappeau et al. 2013; Ressler et al. 2020, 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Dexter et al. 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dexter, J., Agol, E., & Fragile, P. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • College of Charleston (US)
Corresponding author
Dexter, Jason
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-09-14
Volume
703
Issue
2
Pages
L142-L146
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2055299974
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic Center black hole, magnetized accretion, synchrotron radiation, time-dependent radiative transfer, accretion rate, black hole spin, magnetic turbulence, light curves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review